Most journalists are still sitting on Twitter or those that got kick out from Twitter are on Nazi infested Substack.

Any as long as it’s in English.

I specified written. Independent news commentators are everywhere since video format is still a profitable model, but they all rely on written news sources or random social media posts.

Several of mine:

• !arknights@lemmy.zip
• !blackmythwukong@lemmy.zip
• !pathofexile@lemmy.zip
• !pathofexile2@lemmy.zip

Gaming communities are hard to grow since they require people who play the game to participate. You can only grow it on your own so much by posting the latest news.

Other active ones on lemmy.zip:

• !diablo@lemmy.zip
• !sekiro@lemmy.zip
• !star_trek@lemmy.zip
• !starfield@lemmy.zip
• !bloodborne@lemmy.zip

It converts YouTube links into privacy-friendly frontend.

It was always happening and at a large scale, it’s just there are new reporting requirements now, which leads to more nonspecialized publications to cover it more often.

• https://lemmy.fediverse.observer/stats
• https://fedidb.org/software/lemmy
• https://the-federation.info/platform/73

You are missing the point. You don’t have to become a subject expert to verify the information. Not all sources are the same, some are incorrect on purpose, some are incorrect due to lax standards. As a thinking human being, you can decide to trust one source over the other. But LLMs sees all the information they are trained on as 100% correct. So it can generate factually incorrect information while believing what it provided you are 100% factually correct.

Using LLMs as a shortcut to find something is like playing a Russian roulette, you might get correct information 5 out of 6 times, but that one time is guaranteed to be incorrect.

Useless. Unless you are dumb enough to trust the result without verifying it yourself. And if you do verify it, at that point you spend more time than just doing a regular search.

I didn’t even notice, but yeah, same. Though the front page says it’s limited time.

So Matrix protocol?

It’s the same type of microtransactions that they had in Resident Evil 4 Remake, so it’s probably not so much a test as a limit they found where backlash is small enough that it still makes sense. But there are 2 big differences with Dragon’s Dogma 2.

1. They fucked up the PC port.
2. They increased the base game price.

Anyone that tries to justify microtransactions in a paid game is a moron. They were literally introduced in free to play games to finance the game development. In paid game, it’s just pure greed.

Rules in question stated as a reason for removing the comments and temporary ban:

1. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
2. Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.

People can make their own conclusions.

Rarely drink cocktails, but Long Island Ice Tea is probably my go-to.

That’s what I said.

While copyright applies automatically

You can’t enforce it without it being registered. Courts will reject any claim that is filled with unregistered copyright.

In very limited circumstances. While copyright applies automatically, it has to be registered with the Copyright Office for you to be able to enforce it. I doubt Lemmy posters register each of their posts with the Copyright Office.

Nobody. It’s a public forum, anyone can take what you said and use it as their own.

From technical side, instance admins, community moderators, and you have the ability to remove them.

The number of winners is one hundred thousand (100,000) and each winner will win the following:

• One (1) Steam code to play the Video Game (hereinafter the “Game Key”)

Therefore, there are one hundred thousand (100,000) Game Keys with a unit value of 19,99 € (nineteen euros and ninety-nine cents). One (1) per winner. All Game Key are the same. No Game Key is different or gives different access than the others.

The Game Key will be accepted as-is and cannot be refunded or exchanged or be the subject of a financial consideration.

Source: https://media-center.bandainamcoent.eu/games/man-of-medan/TDP-MOM-GIVEAWAY-RULES-EN.pdf

Flawed methodology. No single option works since different options have different use cases.

60%