rowdyrockets

Bad bot.

1h old account following the same bot behaviors as that Docker user.

Suspect.

I was going to high school in France when Saw 6 came out.

Everyone was calling it sausage - was pretty funny at the time.

Saw Six / saucisse

Your privacy is the same on either. But now, anyone can gain that information, not just Reddit’s investors and partners.

It’s what you write on these platforms that affects your privacy.

I’m not calling for the admins to be burned at the stake. If you don’t perceive an obvious slant in their words that’s fine - I’m sharing my take just like they’re sharing theirs.

Agreed. They support the genocide and are hiding behind the law to save face.

Ezpz. Just added feddit.org to my instance block. Freedom of the fediverse at work.

I don’t attribute it to malice. A misleading claim is just that, misleading, whatever their intentions.

It’s alright if we disagree.

I stand by that. It is a bit disingenuous (purposefully or ignorantly) to call 11% “en masse”.

Business administration and marketing aren’t bad skills to have. But the majors are flooded and neither are considered particularly difficult to achieve. If your intention is to stand out in the workforce, those will fail you.

11% is certainly not nothing, but the vast majority are not working these jobs.

I’m not really sure how you can look at 11% and say “yes, they are working these jobs en masse”. A bit disingenuous.

Edit: Post OP and others continue to downvote - yet can’t counter. I’m sorry college didn’t have the outcome you expected, it’s definitely no longer the golden ticket it once was. But to claim it isn’t a benefit at all, or indicate that most college grads are unable to use their degrees is at best misleading and at worst disinformation. There are a lot of variables, including the major you choose, and how much you spend to complete the degree.

Seems you’ve upset a lot of people without a college degree, or a lot of people doing nothing with their degree.

It’s a bummer people downvote facts when it hurts their feelings. Pretty much a page out of the conservative playbook.

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

In the States you just look outside for this one.

It was eventually replaced in circulation by an uncut, redubbed version produced by Walt Disney Pictures in 2005.

Okay thank the gods, I must have had this one. That would place me about 10yo, and I definitely don’t remember any “gorgon monsters”. Thanks for the context! I’m relieved now haha

Wait - I had this on DVD and loved it as a kid. I watched the English dub of course because my 10yo brain didn’t have the patience for reading subs.

I remember a strong ecological and pacifistic message. What was changed?

I used LLMs (gpt4.5-preview) to write portions of my resume. But I also used a paid service that uses AI to supposedly scan your resume in the same fashion these HR tools do - and gives recommendations on improving to better get past the filters. I’m early in the process but I’m getting a solid amount of HR interviews scheduled, and a technical interview tomorrow.

My point is, I don’t think using AI in a resume is necessarily a bad thing so long as you go into it with the intention of getting past filters.

It sucks that job searching has devolved to SEO-spam and AI hallucinations but here we are.

As is your right. If the community agrees to make a change, and you don’t like that change, you’re welcome to leave the community. Congrats on having free will!

Nice “gotcha”. But you know what I meant. We should discuss adding it as a sub rule - so we can report it for AI as they come.