• Corgana@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    They absolutely were, without question. That said, there’s nothing this guy can do to make that happen on Mastodon instances he doesn’t own.

    • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      Just a quick reminder that Twitter was banning 10s of thousands of accounts of extremists that breached its terms of service, including a certain ex president of the US. It was imperfect, but ‘running rampant’ is a stretch

      • The Cuuuuube@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        How many times did Trump show his true colors before getting banned? Twitter’s moderation policies were better pre-Musk but they were far FAR from acceptable.

      • Corgana@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        It seems like we agree on the facts, and I certainly won’t disagree that it’s worse now, but I would characterize Twitter’s (pre-Musk) response to extremism as “measured, lacking and lethargic”, before I would use “imperfect”, which still implies “pretty good” and from my perceptive it was not good enough to make me want to use it. I think maybe we just have a different tolerance for hate speech.