• alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.orgOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    you may take the United Fruit Company’s name, but you can’t take its legacy of financing terrorism and violence in Latin America…

    • Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      At least United Fruit did it with the knowledge, blessing, and assistance of the US government. Chiquita looking like amateurs here.

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    People should look into the history of banana trade for context. It’s a fascinating example of how capitalism has gone awry before.

  • delirious_owl@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    The jury accepted the argument that the money transferred to the paramilitaries was used to commit war crimes such as homicides, kidnappings, extortion, torture and forced disappearances.

    Did they mean crimes against humanity? What war was being fought?

    • Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Legally neither, this was a civil liability case and not a criminal proceeding. The war they are referring to is the Colombian conflict, which is ongoing.