if the devs aren’t just pasting AI generated art onto their products, there’s nothing to see here.
would it have been not ok if the devs were straight up pasting AI generated art onto their products? since there doesnt seem like there is anything stopping people from making minor changes to AI generated art enough to claim its new, especially considering how vague the interviewee is being
IMO, there are some ethical concerns but I don’t have a reply that I think I’ve spent enough time time thinking about.
In terms of legality, I’m pretty sure there are lots of issues but I’m not sure of the specific terminologies.
Personally, I think it is going to be really hard to tell one way or the other without some lengthy investigation but as long as the team is being open with using AI for inspiration rather than complete end products, I’m more likely to believe them since there would be legal concerns otherwise.
Look guys, this is going to happen, has been happening, and isn’t unique to AI.
People draw inspiration from the things they see, if the devs aren’t just pasting AI generated art onto their products, there’s nothing to see here.
would it have been not ok if the devs were straight up pasting AI generated art onto their products? since there doesnt seem like there is anything stopping people from making minor changes to AI generated art enough to claim its new, especially considering how vague the interviewee is being
IMO, there are some ethical concerns but I don’t have a reply that I think I’ve spent enough time time thinking about.
In terms of legality, I’m pretty sure there are lots of issues but I’m not sure of the specific terminologies.
Personally, I think it is going to be really hard to tell one way or the other without some lengthy investigation but as long as the team is being open with using AI for inspiration rather than complete end products, I’m more likely to believe them since there would be legal concerns otherwise.