• Jeena@jemmy.jeena.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Fair enough, I should have said “government is paying by subsidizing for a lot of EVs”. It doesn’t say it in this article but from other articles I read in the past it was a substantial part of the price which the government paid so that it was worth it. Don’t forget that those subsidiaries are the reason why the EU is investigating if they should put on extra taxes on Chinese EVs or not.

    • Sonori@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Much like with solar panels, the EU hasn’t invested in the factory capacity to meet demand and is now working to protect its own industry by being outcompeted by competitors who did. It’s also silly since the EU and US do the same exact thing.

      • Jeena@jemmy.jeena.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        So let’s assume that the EU and the US are doing the same, where are the mountains of discarded EVs like we see in China?

        • Sonori@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Umm, Uber and Lyft don’t own thier own cars, and haven’t gone out of business, ao why would there be a few parking lots full of company cars left over after a bankruptcy in the US?