• cubism_pitta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    A small reactor like what we use in submarines or our aircraft carriers would probably be the best tool for the job on the moon. They are small and require minimal maintenance (within their fairly long lifespan) and they produce enormous amounts of power.

    How much weight in solar panels would it take to produce what a reactor could?

    Would a single panel on the moon last more than 20 years?

    How do we decommission panels on the moon?

    (forgot about batteries)… all of these things IDEALLY will come back down to Earth some day so the fewer things we put on the moon in the first place the better

      • teft@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s more efficient to launch it out of the solar system. Less Δv required.

        • Ptsf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          Imagine being the first alien civilization to find remnants of ancient human culture in space, and it’s a cancerous death rock screaming radiation… Haha