I’d argue that at this point, sticking to the collective vs individual dichotomy of climate attribution and action potential is climate action delayist. When your argument relies you or your group intentionally doing absolutely nothing to combat climate change, you don’t really have climate change in mind.
Leftism sometimes cares more about class than its very foundation, the environment, to understand why there is a problem with blame-shifting.
I’ve seen this in a similar fashion in relationship advice forums: Commenters not engaging with the issue or person, but knee-jerk reacting with advising instant breakup.
I haven’t been on reddit for over a year, but I cannot imagine that topics like say atheism don’t polarise. What makes you think it is the case?
I don’t quite understand your point. Do you maybe have some examples to understand better?
Ah, yes, patricide69 and magecock, sure.
This is quite an individualist mindset; I was mainly talking about YT Trends-type of music - music likely listened to by millions, shaping the minds of millions.
Have you seen music lyrics? They’re full of advertisements.
People pride themselves to be walking billboards. I think it somewhat resembles wearing the coat of arms of your lord in the millennia before.
Ostdeutsche Geschichte-Witz hier einfügen
Der Mais sieht lecker aus, aber wer tut Nudeln in den Fingersalat?
Das letzte Mal als ich in Eystrup war, hatte ich 24h nicht geschlafen und im Penny oder so was gefrühstückt, weil sich jemand vor unseren Zug geworfen hatte und der Zug erst wieder morgens um 8 oder so fuhr…
Smh @ ur fud
You might want to differentiate between Top, Bottom, Switch and Top, Bottom, Versatile, i.e. BDSM vs penetration positions.
I’d also say that this is less about physiology and more about the individual acceptance of the concept of position.
Top, Bottom, Versatile is not necessarily a queer thing, since (cis&trans) heterosex can have positions as well. That is to say, not all queer relationships regardless of gender follow the concept of position.