Yeah, that’s what the comment you replied to starts with.
Yeah, that’s what the comment you replied to starts with.
Your comment makes sense in the frame of “ugly people are allowed to make music,” my comment refers to the “music was better” part of the post.
The ugly people you mentioned don’t support your comment’s argument against the original assertion because their music is terrible, not “better.”
Some music sucked in the boomer’s days, made by ugly and pretty people alike.
But the contention is about music being better, and that’s some bad music.
That’s right.
Like tent poles and aircraft ĥulls. Checks out
That’s correct.
I’m aware, and agree
Well I think you bought “Aluminum Free,” whereas the one on the left doesn’t say that. That brand sells both aluminum-full snd aluminum-free.
Can you remember the first time you felt insecure about your ability to come up with backstories? What was that like? And so on
Would you say what you’re seeking is “more intimacy,” up to, potentially, the most possible intimacy?
I would suggest looking at his different interests and getting curious. If you’re interested in the guy, it should be pretty easy to find reasons why this film or that game are endearingly-this-or-that in a way that makes you like and respect him even more.
Then, you bond over it; by trusting his taste (intimacy) enough to check out that show or whatever interest, you now have an opportunity to get deep (intimacy) into what you each individually felt (intimacy) about it, and maybe you felt something in common. That’s some foundation for intimacy.
I’m going to relentlessly spam your podcast with spelling and grammar corrections so the ridiculous and unfeasible crimes pale in comparison to the word crimes I’ve exposed.
I think it could very well be dissolving at least a coating. I would use more dilute IPA. 👍
Good point well made. I think it’s usually naive wishful thinking (for a “just world” that makes sense and is going to be OK, actually) that allows a liberal capitalist apologist to point to classical economics and say “see the companies are hurting,” but the companies don’t have feelings, and the owners and shareholders are feeling just fine.
Why did you reply to my comment to restate the first part of what I said?