Who?

point taken, but that’s also an accurate description of cosmic horror

It’s still a protected trademark, just that people have called everything a dremel

like I said, I edited the title

Apparently, whoever added this was an awful devil who decided that adding false information with sources that only sourced the history and usage of the term was a good idea.

The trademark is adrenalin, not adrenaline, and owned by Endo, not Pfizer. I have edited the title and am editing the article as we type. Apparently there’s someone who posted to the talk page about this back in may but didn’t get noticed.

This was changed on 4 May 2023 by someone who thought he was correcting a typo.

Actually, someone synthesized something very similar in 1897 and named it “epinephrine”. 4 years later, someone independently synthesized it and trademarked it as “adrenaline”.

The terminology is now one of the few differences between the INN and BAN systems of names.[72] Although European health professionals and scientists preferentially use the term “adrenaline”, the converse is true among American health professionals and scientists. Nevertheless, even among the latter, receptors for this substance are called “adrenergic receptors” or “adrenoceptors”, and pharmaceuticals that mimic its effects are often called “adrenergics”. The history of adrenaline and epinephrine is reviewed by Rao.[73]

That’s a Medium article whose author is “Python Programmer at Google.” [sic]. You sure it’s a reliable source?

Edit: Author shares the same first name as OP.

It’s probably a similar learning speed

FORTRAN: Proto-Indo-European COBOL: Proto-Sino-Tibetic

Assembly: neuron signals

OP omits the context that they posted this as a joke/meme. Still horrifying, like if you parodied the Nazi-era Star of David.

Not them

deleted by creator

It’s okay, I assumed the PRC was what you meant. (As a tangent, what do you think of using CPC vs CCP to refer to their party?)

Whoops, there’s to my implicit bias despite being from said state in question. But among the deeply capitalist countries, where most of us reside, it’s usually true.

<small>(And now, for a small bit of pedantry, India is unfortunately the world’s most populous state as of 2023.)</small>

Well, there’s a relatives to relativity. Overton is quite relative while the spectrum is only a bit relative. Per the sources . It’s no use restricting the left against anyone who advocate maintaining capitalism, as there won’t be enough political entities left… in the “left”, thus “right” constitutes nearly no meaning save commonality.

Well, since the world is nearly all capitalist, the system is currently treated as an assumption of the center; this makes progressivism to the left of the average, just like how the center has moved to the right in the US.

Anyways, rest assured, I’m still reading the book you recommended.

Yeah, $2 can also be transliterated, whereupon it becomes “two dollars”; 2024-09-20 can also be transliterated, wherein there are two major competing orders: DMY and MDY. And I agree that other major orders are too wordy, and that’s sort of my point.

These are the same things unless you’re talking about economic liberalism. That’s like saying “right, not conservative”.

I wouldn’t look at the lifestyle section for news. Lifestyle is always lifestylish.

The same NYT that is currently sanewashing Trump?

Why restate the obvious for the millionth time? Nearly nobody who’d wholeheartedly support Trump reads NYT regularly. There’s so much more better and substantial stuff to report like how a Canadian province is covering up a mysterious brain disease that has a much higher potential of changing society rather than just “oh trump is still wagging is way along”. EnoughTrumpSpam already.

The same NYT that sat on the story about the NSA spying on US citizens for over a year at the request of the Bush administration?

I’ll concede that. Like I said, to a lesser extent.

The NYT is pretty left leaning and consistently has high quality (save the opinion section). I did not understand “left” to gatekeep sources like Vox. This is like shifting the definition of the right to exclude anyone who isn’t around or further than MAGA.