Album on lemmy.ca, beehaw.org, shit.itjust.works & lemmy.world
https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html
Globally it’s at about 47% and growing at about 4% per year. If the rate remains unchanged it’ll be about a decade for >95%.
But the reality of it is, you don’t need global adoption out of the box. You just need majority adoption in the countries you visit, which for me are western countries (north America and Europe) which now have a majority adoption.
Most of China can’t reach Google so the reporting is off anyway. But in 2023 the govt mandated ipv6 support to all carriers and manufacturers.
https://www.theregister.com/2023/10/17/china_networking_hardware/
You think an asus, linksys, netgear,etc doesnt handle ipv6???
Do you have an example? Because it works great on openwrt, dd-wrt, pfsense, opnsense, unifi, mikrotik…and then if you’re using the isp equipment it works out of the box.
Honestly this isn’t even true anymore. Most major ISPs have implemented dual stack now. The customer doesn’t know or care because it’s done at the CPE for them.
I use a browser extension which tells me if the site I’m at is 6 or 4 or mixed. In 2024 most major sites support V6. A lot of this is due to CDN supporting it natively.
The fact that GitHub doesn’t is quickly becoming the exception.
Isn’t that the whole point? But no to the latter question. Your shoes rub your toes but you probably forget about it after a while. Ever wear sandals? There’s comfy pairs and uncomfy pairs.
I’ve seen specific numbers so many times I know we’re living in a sim
A blog of another website’s report on what reddit users wrote.
Nice.
This politician eliminated pollution overnight! Other politicians hate him, see how he did it.
You’re just exemplifying the inherent problem.
People need housing. People without a house are a risk. People with houses won’t let people that need housing rent a house because of said risk. Thus we are back at the start where people need housing but can’t get it because of the broken system.
You can talk about risk management until you’re blue in the face but it doesn’t change the fact that landlords are participating in a broken system that leaves real people in one of the worst situations you can be in.
Long term losses > short term gains
In english a double negative is a positive, and is syntactically incorrect.
If you guys think that’s cool you should see what I can do with a double negative.
I’ve lived in both US and Canada.
In Canada, my mother had cancer stayed in a private room for weeks until she died and we only paid for the phone bill for her room and parking. I didn’t get a bill from the hospital at all. No claims on insurance.
I had a baby in 2021 and again my wife had a private room while she recovered from her C section and my infant was in the NICU for a week. No bill from the hospital, no claims on insurance. Just paid for parking.
My wife who is type 1 diabetic had 100% of her needs covered through the ontario healthcare system.
I hear stories that in Ontario you have to wait for non-urgent care due to Premier Doug Ford not paying nurses enough, but I have not seen this personally.
I had work coverage that provided dental, vision, and drug coverage if needed.
In the US, I’m 100% dependent on work provided benefits AND I have to pay $4k a year for those benefits. Wife went for some routine work done and it was covered by work insurance. In ontario it would have been a no cost thing too, no dealing with insurance. We wouldn’t have waited in Ontario, we didn’t wait here either.
There seem to be waits here for specialists. Haven’t had to go to the hospital for anything yet.
Enable nat loopback on your router
Not trying to prove you or anyone else wrong… that’s a really odd and unnecessarily defensive take.
It’s just a discussion.
It’s not really about eating the costs of doing business. A restaurant doesn’t charge you $1 at the end of your bill for washing your fork, it’s just part of the cost of serving the dish and so your Salmon Rice dish is $18 not $17.
The point is that the listed prices for services should either have these fees be built right into the price…as pretty much all businesses do…or if you’re going to put it at the end of the bill then it needs to be clearly defined per FCC.
It’s a transparency problem. Not only is your $60 cell phone bill not actually $60 but then they also don’t tell you about the additional fees very well when they tack them on at the end. It’s gotta be one or the other, not neither.
Nicotine sales would probably go up. It’s a mild stimulant.
Layer 8!