Depends of the sector i guess

No motivation to do better leads to stagnating tech evolution. If you remove private business you stagnate

No. Counter strike

In Italy we are split between terroni (24th evening celebration and 25th lunch celebration) and polentoni (25th lunch and 26 lunch)

At the end happens often that families are mixed so you do all the 3. On top of that you have friends to meet and what’s best than another lunch/dinner?

And a nice username as well

Well. If your measurement method is “no one ever complained” there lie a problem. It happened to me to smell other people grossness but i wouldnt dare to tell them, i simply avoid em.

Your plan is stupid. Especially if you are young you should sleep a minimum of 7 hours per day. Adapt your schedule and fix your priorities but the solution is not to sleep less. Otherwise: cocaine probably.

He had his cycle

Dungeons and daddies

Yes but it’s the creators that brings the people. YouTube worked because at the beginning it was the only place where you could upload videos and nobody was thinking about making a dime.

Which for the price they ask i would say its the minimum. Recently i played “resident evil village” 10 hours, good game but very short.

I feel like it’s the opposite. It’s rare to find single player games longer than 20h.

Talking about use, not how much the company is worth. It was overinflated anyway like many of s&p500

The reality is that nothing is really dying and nothing is really changing. Twitter is still fully operational and other than a small hit nothing happened. Twitch already did a step back. For Reddit we’ll see but only a really small percentage of reddit is using third party apps.

Regarding the number part: what if there were athletes that did not come out yet? (I don’t know how it works, totally ignorant on the matter)

Then for the rest I see what you mean. I guess my opinion as a science guy is to do more tests (like, let them openly compete, more data more sense)

From: https://www.bbc.com/sport/61346517

*Tucker: When boys reach the age of 13-14, things start to change physically and we see increased muscle mass, bone density; [it] changes the shape of the skeleton, changes the heart and the lung, haemoglobin levels, and all of those things are significant contributors to performance.

Lowering the testosterone has some effect on those systems, but it’s not complete, and so for the most part, whatever the biological differences are that were created by testosterone persist even in the presence of testosterone reduction - or, if I put that differently, even after testosterone levels are lowered.

It leaves behind a significant portion of what gives males sporting performance advantages over females.*

So i guess it depends on when the transition happens?

I was more on the “no discount even after 5 years that a game is out”

Nintendo only wants to sell you new games at full price>

Nintendo only wants to sell you old games still at full price.

Fixed it for you

Like they were already loosing users before musk? Do you have a source?

I can see the issue but at the same time is scary. In the future this thing could be bad. Like who is drawing the line and where?