![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/1df05a77-c6dd-4662-9ea3-62a24ca9a25f.jpeg)
Couldn’t disagree more. You’d miss out on such bangers as “Congratulations, you are being rescued. Please do not resist.”
Couldn’t disagree more. You’d miss out on such bangers as “Congratulations, you are being rescued. Please do not resist.”
Writing boring shit is LLM dream stuff. Especially tedious corpo shit. I have to write letters and such a lot, it makes it so much easier having a machine that can summarise material and write it in dry corporate language in 10 seconds. I already have to proof read my own writing, and there’s almost always 1 or 2 other approvers, so checking it for errors is no extra effort.
I feel like a lot of the commenters here are not getting the reference.
What??
Wait, it’s all regex?
Always has been
There are certain people I know who have a very distinctive smell that I would recognise… But realistically I’d have to get very close to reliably smell it.
The headline is misleading. The actually statistic given in the article is “between 1 and 3.7%”
Do you really have to jump to “women are skanks”? Some people are just so excited to throw out a slur when they think they can get away with it, eh?
I agree. I still enjoyed it, I thought it was good - possibly it just didn’t live up to the promise of the first. For the visuals & music alone I’m glad I went to see it. But it was definitely rushed, I think two films that stick closer to the text would have worked better personally - especially if they had a closer tone to the first.
Solid red cause I’m a cheepskate, but my mouse is flies the 🌈
Also thanks team, downvotes for saying I like having one monitor lmao
When I moved from the office to home I changed to a single monitor… And I have never missed the other one. I mean, I’m not a software engineer, so YMMV.
The attachment to Sandman might be enough to keep it going yknow
Smart. I like the idea of replacing biometrics with something that can’t easily be cloned - learned behaviour. Perhaps with a robust ML approach you could use analysis of gait, expressions, and other subtle behavioural tics rather than or in addition to facial/fingerprint/iris recognition. I suspect that would be very hard to fake - although perhaps vulnerable to, idk, having a bad day and acting “off”.
I venture that anyone who speaks French would.
Lmao this is like that Nathan For You episode where customers had to hike up a mountain to send their rebate 😂
Holy shit that’s amazing
I’m not sure my income can support a full time student and full time layabout lol
ML is not good for coding, it is good for approximately solving very complex problems.
Yes, I think this illustrates the point more than provides any useful advice. I don’t know before I sleep on it if I’m going to sleep well, so how do I choose?
It’s called hackthebox not hackoutofthebox