I don’t know what you mean lol

Hard agree on this one (´･ω･`)

Yeah, what’s with boomers and the need to add an emoji at the end if each message?

I actually prefer to microdit.

As someone unfamiliar with “what lawyers actually do”, it does feel like a big part of what more junior Lawyers do (primarily on the research through older case law) could be major my helped by AI.

Is there something I’m missing in that?

Older AI image generation be like

Came here to say this. Glad I was beaten to it.

I need to experience my midlife crisis first.

I feel you brother. Boy, if only I’d known what I had when i had it, ya know?

Exact thing happened to me ~2018. Haven’t changed it since. (Though my growing bald spot may ruin it in the next few years)

I was wondering what happened with this the other day (haven’t kept up with XKCD since highschool).

It makes me happy that they’re both still here.

I’ve never been aware of Thomas Jefferson being into women in that age range. Can you expand on that / pass resources for further research?

Asking primarily because I tend to favor Jefferson among the founding fathers. I’d be very disappointed if he was actually into…that. But want to be sure I have an accurate picture of historical figures.

"Yeah Facebook, I’d like to report this post.

Reason: I’m in it and don’t like it"

Ah, yup, this makes sense. I’m in good ol’ U.S. of A (for context in my previous comments, in case it wasn’t obvious). Hearing about these European laws def makes me envious for some modern work reforms.

You’re not wrong, and I agree.

TL;DR: I don’t want perfect to be the enemy of good enough.

I do worry that being too aggressive with that rate would cause the private sector to lobby extra hard and thus prevent any legislation from happening in the first place, hence why I suggest a reduced (but still substantial) stipend for the unemployed-but-still-bound period. In the sectors this most effects, the pay is generally high enough that one would have a comparatively easy time surviving on half salary while they figure out next life steps (as loathsome a compromise of that scale would be)

That’s neat.

I’ve been saying that basically needs to be the way non-competes work (that you receive some payment; 50-75% of original salary while unemployed and under non-compete) restrictions.

Man, someone needs to tell these guys that they can just resign. They don’t need to implement laws that are sure to get them voted out next election, they can just quit any time they want.

Link for the lazy to bill’s text:

Is there actually a way to do mapping (like google maps) with Vim? Or am I reading too much into the meme?

Sounds like a good resource, but I guess what I meant was a setting to run a game in (e.g. a campaign set in the Inner Sea or Sword Coast) with enemies and grabbags of challenges with balanced NPCs for side interactions and such.

I’ve always been allergic to spell casters (the strategy behind the best use of spell slots just never clicked for me - which is extra painful because it seems like if should be simple, but I consistently manage to botch it), going back to when i picked this all up in the 3.0e days.

I think that’s caused me to not really engage with the spell casting side of spell casters in PF2e. I remember in 3.5, we banned Mystics because spontaneous divine spell casting was broken, so maybe I just need to run one to see if work.