But you ask anyone who knows anything about fighting and the first thing they tell you to do is to cut your hair short because it’s just an easy handle to grab on to.

I’m going to throw myself into a vat of toxic waste to gain superpowers to do those crimes anyway.

Idk how you could reach that conclusion. Maybe you watched 7 and haven’t seen 4 in a while. It’s not just your John Wick example. The movie is pretty shameless about lifting the structure of 4, it’s not some subtle nuanced technicality.

Idk if original stories is something you can give it. The bigger death star is far from the only plot point lifted directly out of episode 4. Seriously, go back and watch ep 4 and ep 7 it’s almost shot-for-shot (not really but for some of the story beats it could be).

Maybe what you’re saying is that the character back stories are original which, kinda.

But this is a picture of a ToyYoda!

And do you eat that spaghetti out of a bool?

Immutable because the only lists worth iterating over are the ones I define for myself.

I think they were saying I assumed they were neurotypical when I first responded. Which, fair, most people are.

I think, ironically, this is you missing a social cue. Namely implied hyperbole.

Literally half of “social cues” are pretending not to acknowledge something and hoping that leaving it unsaid draws attention to it.

Why would you post this, my phone exploded and took a shit. I didnt know it could do that.

Absolutely wild thing to say. The time it takes for someone to learn a language enough to delete an app, especially an adult is so astronomical that there’s no reason for apps to try and stop you from learning the language.

No mother, it’s just the Disney rights.

I think you could definitely read and bugfix code without ever learning to “write” code. Code intentionally reads kind of like a language, it’s possible that this guy was just doing very simple tasks and the most he would have to change are variable names and values. Maybe he knows how to fix errors reported by the code and knows how to look for variables.

It’s a fine line between that and knowing how to code, but that’s kinda the joke of this post I guess.

deleted by creator

Human’s superpower is being the stand-in privileged class.

I’m in engineering school and the ethos definitely is “engineers write bad code but it’s for simple tasks involving complex math.” As the world of engineering steers more and more towards coding we’re definitely going to be expected to write applications instead of simple Matlab scripts and there’s no way it’s going to be pleasant.

That goes back to the point I was making earlier. For some reason a bank teller is hired for the same wage for the same hours, but I can almost guarantee you that because of the ATM they spend significantly less of their work day “working” because the ATM was designed to do a significant portion of their job. There certainly is an excuse to keep them around all day, there are some unavoidable tasks that only a human can do and they come up at random times throughout the day, but the ATM has replaced many of the working hours the bank tellers used to have even if the job didn’t go away.

Sure, but also almost by definition, using tech to replace workers in other industries will reduce the total amount of workers needed for that job as you made the tech presumably to make the job easier or faster. My post was talking about the tech industry just because that was the topic, but as you mention, tech definitely replaces jobs in all sectors.