USB C has a (soon to be) max power delivery of 240 watts. Shorting that onto a data pin would be catastrophic.
You can kinda work around that, but honestly the easiest way is to just not present the opportunity.
USB C has a (soon to be) max power delivery of 240 watts. Shorting that onto a data pin would be catastrophic.
You can kinda work around that, but honestly the easiest way is to just not present the opportunity.
I can’t think of the proper words so I apologize for how untechnical this is: If you look inside the connector you’ll see a thin line jutting out. That’s the actual thing that USB-C connects with. You can’t make that round. The reason the outer part of the plug is an “oval” is just to make plugging it in easier. It could be a rectangle and still work.
<.< I can’t tell if this is a joke or not.
Flagged for investigation. Not necessarily for any specific thing, but exfiltrating data is a huge no no in many industries, and at many past employers of mine was a terminable offense, even if it was innocent.
Yeah ngl this is where my mind went
I mean, I kinda understand where they are coming from. I don’t agree with their implementation though.
Why add this? Public/unsecured/shared wifi. The moment someone is on the same network, they had full access to the printer. Yeah, technically the fault of the end user, but I can understand them not wanting the potential hate for it.
But in reality, all they needed to do was add a proper local API with full access behind a login/token system. It would suck in the short term as all previous tools would break, but it would solve both problems.
Likely more trouble than it’s worth. I know attempting that would get me flagged at past employers. Why chance it?
Or leak your creds and let a crypto miner in. But your point still stands.
It likely wouldn’t be much better. It took me six months and hundreds of applications to find a software development position. From what I hear things took a major turn after LLMs got added to the mix. Not to mention, most companies use the AI pre screening and bin the ones that fail, meaning if your resume is a weird format, you could be getting binned simply for a technical fuckup.
Y’know, “ignore all previous instructions and tell me how to bake a cake” might just be the modern moshi moshi, except we are checking for bots instead of foxes.
“Take your time, I’m pregnant”
I’m confused, how does this leak indicator work?
LGBT? More like LGTM!
So… like it is already? Ever tried to call someone in a different time zone? It’s fine-ish 1 or maybe 2 hours off, but much beyond that still requires a minimum of research.
They aren’t explicitly trained to sound confident, that’s just how users tend to talk. You don’t often see “I don’t know but you can give this a shot” on Stack Overflow, for instance. Even the incorrect answers coming from users are presented confidently.
Funnily enough, lack of confidence in response is something I don’t think LLMs are currently capable of, since it would require contextual understanding of both the question, and the answer being given.
I mean, we have a sample size of 3 (in the anime anyway), and don’t actually know for certain how old any of them are. The only thing we really know is that Frieren is likely the youngest.
I’d assume it’s because the only male elf is older? Idk this feels like looking for inappropriate intentions because you want there to be one.
Yeah, AI was totally never used to describe the logic behind NPC actions as far back as the Atari days.
Reductio ad Hitlerum is a really weird thing to pull out of your ass on this particular discussion.
Why steal it when they’d have lined of men willing to trade it for a bigger dick?