Moats. I was kidding at first, but I’m now thinking lazy rivers are modern moats.
Moats. I was kidding at first, but I’m now thinking lazy rivers are modern moats.
That sounds like an adult with a social and/or psychological issue.
I liked Devs. It had a dope concept. That show didn’t get much buzz.
I think it’s “Best Service Ever”.
The picture on this page seems to have the same screen minus the red box.
At least it has an end.
Good chatbots right now have great spelling and decent grammar. That already makes it not the worst insult.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but I don’t think that makes sense. The planet Vulcan was destroyed in that 2009 movie. It exists and changed in Discovery.
Why do people try to pretend Elon Musk isn’t insanely rich? His net worth can easily be leveraged into 40 billion dollars.
I’m not sure about the top one. He could be saying everyone is living a life of sin (like 402 said).
The bottom one is definitely saying he lives an odd life because that’s literally an odd function. i.e.
f(-x) = -f(x) for all x
It’s a weird thing to say because you can’t know that it’s not funny or still not funny without watching it. SNL is and has always been hit or miss with humor. Some humor ages well. Some doesn’t. Sometimes it’s really funny. Sometimes it’s ok.
I watched the first episode when they had some anniversary airing and a lot of those jokes are… ok.
And it’s upvoted
No, I actually thought you were joking. I think people are pretty ordinary and can’t telepathically tell that stuff in text. I bet you can’t deduce my gender, orientation, race, hair color, and name. I assume this because I didn’t tell you any of these things.
You can’t be serious.
You never mentioned you were nonbinary. Isn’t it possible that people were being contrarian without being transphobic?
In fairness, I assumed you were American too, because you said “we end up with this guy as president”.
This table only covers some of your criteria, but it’s pretty large. It’s a good source for finding another home instance.
https://github.com/maltfield/awesome-lemmy-instances/blob/main/README.md
They are programmatically token predictors. It will never be “closer” to intelligence for that very reason. The broader question should be, “can a token predictor simulate intelligence?”