Lath

We kill each other too often.

You know that scene with the guy on the castle wall in Monty Python and the Holy Grail that farts in your general direction?
Yeah, I giggled.

That I exist. And that we’re in a relationship.

It’s a love-hate thing. You wouldn’t get it…

Eh. Close enough. We’ll forget about them in the next episode anyway.

Taking into consideration all the details I’m remembering right now, probably no.

• Asgards are small. Nowhere to hide for the goa’uld.
• Genetically speaking, Asgards are fucked up. If a goa’uld tried to interface with one, they’d likely die.
• As mass produced clones, the bodies likely have some security system implemented. Anti-piracy DRM or something. Cloneuvo.

Wait, I thought dating jail bait was the best way to keep feeling young?

Ah, this is the certain death door.

I understand that, I really do. However, what if you change nazi memorabilia with LGBT+ stuff? Is the bartender still correct in doing so?

Or change the LGBT+ stuff to any kind of recognizable symbols of a certain group. Is it still the paradox of tolerance or is it now the paradox of intolerance? Note that this isn’t something leading. I am asking as a question that I don’t know the answer to.

I know that some groups shouldn’t be tolerated in a society they want to destroy. But here’s the thing, we can’t not live with them. If we as a society, destroy or segregate groups of a defining nature, don’t we become exactly that which we claim to prevent? And once this type of action starts, can we be sure it will stop there? Who will be the judge, how will they enforce it and for whom?

Anyway, I understand the tale and it’s the bartender’s right to do so.

Most people do stop doing that as well. However, a tiny bit of resentment from being disallowed also takes root. More so when they believe it’s unjust. And if they encounter more and more of “can’t do this, can’t do that”, that resentment grows into something ugly. That ugliness doesn’t care if it’s right or wrong, it only sees oppression and develops into hatred. Which eventually turns into violence.

It ain’t right, but it’s how we’re built. We usually see in 1st person and can’t fathom what it’s like to be on the other side.

People just don’t understand. Because society prohibits exhibitions of hatred, those are most likely to seek out places that do allow it. The desired “freedom” aspect of society-free judgement is why you encounter them more often in these type of forums. And when you got there to “repress” them, it’s seen as the claws of society invading one of the few avenues that allow venting their frustrations.

Think of it like this, everywhere you go there’s rules, rules, rules! You’re stuck doing a job you don’t like to pay bills that keep growing, having to play nice with people you barely get along with 5 to 7 days a week and only an online forum to let you vent off your stress. But then some bozo shows up and yells “no, you can’t do that!”. Wouldn’t that just make you angry?

This isn’t about the correct thing to vent about, it’s about being allowed to vent. When you tell someone they’re not allowed to do something because it’s bad, it usually comes off as taking away their sense of agency, and that just makes them more hateful.

I disagree. Nerds geeking out and descending into a passionate rambling about their favoured subjects is a common reoccurrence that needs to be reigned in periodically. It’s for their own good.

Written by Wolves - Goddess Bad omens - death of peace of mind Nothing more

Edit: CHVRCHES

No risk of scurvy at least.

As a side note, apparently eating too much fruit of the type that can ferment may act the same as alcohol and fuck up your liver.

So, we prefer dictatorships now? Interesting.

What do you mean? Sun is blocked = no sun rays = not blinded when staring directly. The logic is sound! Just like in programming.

I knew. Then I forgot. Now I know again.

You did. I misread at the time or not at all.

I guess it might have been a waste of time they’d rather have skipped. Same as this chain of replies might be for you.
Huh.

I think that’s up to the courts to decide and perhaps in this case, the company decided a verdict against them would be more damaging than a settlement.

Well yes, but Americans have that unpleasant thing called ACAB that likely prevents them from accepting any attempt at removing their perceived self-defense against the abuse committed by authorities.