![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/d3d059e3-fa3d-45af-ac93-ac894beba378.png)
Both. It’s like the saying “Governing a big country is like cooking small fish.” (With the explanation that if you keep poking it, it’ll disintegrate) also taught me how to cook fish as well as realpolitik.
The fish advice was most useful.
Both. It’s like the saying “Governing a big country is like cooking small fish.” (With the explanation that if you keep poking it, it’ll disintegrate) also taught me how to cook fish as well as realpolitik.
The fish advice was most useful.
I mean that’s a problem, but it’s distinct from the word “intelligence”.
An intelligent dog can’t classify a logic problem either, but we’re still happy to call them intelligent.
“Write an essay on the rise of ai and fact check it.”
“Write a verifiable proof of the four colour problem”
“If p=np write a python program demonstrating this, else give me a high-level explanation why it is not true.”
Words might have meanings but AI has been used by researchers to refer to toy neutral networks longer than most people on Lemmy have been alive.
This insistence that AI must refer to human type intelligence is also such a weird distortion of language. Intelligence has never been a binary, human level indicator. When people say that a dog is intelligent, or an ant hive shows signs of intelligence, they don’t mean it can do what a human can. Why should AI be any different?
It’s good for anything that has thousands of examples on stack overflow.
For example, every time I end up trying to work with pandas, I always forget the syntax and it’s generally good here.
Anything unusual, or that is sufficiently complicated that I wouldn’t be able to Google for, and just forget it.
Is buddy really a problem?
I’d be more worried that someone thinks I’m treating them like a dog, than a man.
If you don’t know about it, check out https://wordnet.princeton.edu/
It’s a great starting point for any English word hierarchy.
More generally any personal data obtained from a third party. E.g. if you’re generating a credit score you might contact someone else with a record of financial transactions.
Yeah, I think the reason threads is attaching itself to the fediverse is precisely because meta don’t see it as a threat.
It’s an easy way to appear open to the regulators without actually helping any competitors.
Doom on the switch was amazing for this. I tried to play Doom eternal on the ps4, afterwards, and it was just such a disappointment because it didn’t have gyro.
Did you have symptoms from low vitamin d, and how long did they take to resolve?
This answer shows how shit Chatgpt can be, and how it’s not really self aware.
Very few of these actually apply to chatgpt. And the ones that do, like a lack of awareness of current events don’t apply to those agents connected to the internet.
It’s just parroting old opinions that used to be true
The health stuff is a bit overblown anyway. On a day to day level it’s just junk data.
There’s so much variation between both between people and also for one person just depending on how they feel that you can’t tell what a particular number means.
There’s some argument that heart rate is useful for high-end cardio, where you want to keep track of exactly which heart rate band you’re in to be sure that you’re at capacity but still clearing all the lactate from your system. However, given how much these numbers can vary if you haven’t slept fully or you have a bit of a cold, or you overate, you’re probably better off learning to pace yourself.
Work socks as well.
They’re socks that go with construction boots. Basically the same as hiking socks but cheaper.