Did you bother to read the article or did you only decide to write this argument w/o any substantial basis?
𐑮𐑧𐑝𐑩𐑤𐑪𐑔𐑩 𐑧𐑕𐑑𐑨𐑕 𐑐𐑨𐑔𐑩 𐑒𐑨𐑢 𐑝𐑦𐑝𐑩.
Did you bother to read the article or did you only decide to write this argument w/o any substantial basis?
English has quite many problems in a lot of components. It is not phonemic and is very complex. That is one of the main reasons I got interested in learning Esperanto. It is simple, phonemic and planned to be good.
Bonan tagon al ĉiuj esperantistoj ĉi tie.
«Tenebre Rosso Sangue» by ‹Keygen Church›
People’s War until Communism.
To be honest. I did.
Highlighting this just because I happened to scroll down and came across this. Everything that constitutes matter is considered Chemical. The “X has lots of Chemicals while our product Y is chemical free” is a pseudo-scientific marketting tactic that Naturopaths and Ayurveds commonly use, at least from the Indian Context as I live here. Other than that, have whatever you desire. A person only has one life after all.
Greetings from an Ex-Hindu Atheist. I was never really into Religious Banter that much even as a small kid. But I would say the major propelling force that made me become an Atheist would be my curiosity and eagerness to study science. Science answered all those questions Religion could not and my treatment by my super religious parents helped me not to retain any religious superstitions. Their berating only gave me more strength to continue my study of science and legitimized my standings.
Piracy