

that is such a small edge case that it’s not necessary to talk about them
Did you manage to overlook this point?
that is such a small edge case that it’s not necessary to talk about them
Did you manage to overlook this point?
In general, stay out of the ducking way.
And in both cases, missing the point. Categorize based on the chemistry, not the source of the chemical.
That’s an untenable position. I mean, Cocaine is a plant, too.
I mean we as a group. Some of us will, but they will be decried by the rest of us. Too much, too far, too soon.
If we could all get on the same page, that would be one thing. But it’s like unions, isn’t it? Once man stopping work is just quitting. The whole factory stopping work is industrial action.
kind of my point. Trains need accurately measured time in order to run properly.
Tell that to the trains.
Your last point is wrong, at least as you have stated it. Evaporation time is based on surface area, and the required power is based on volume, but you expressed the amount of water as a length.
Still, metric is way better.
Scientists were so caught up with weather they could, they didn’t stop to think if they should.
I don’t think we have the stomach to pull that off.
I’d love to be wrong, though.
Everybody isn’t going to lose. All of us will, but the rich assholes are gonna win.
That would be a planet-eating star, OR a star eating a planet.
Shouldn’t journalists be able to construct sentences?
when it quits bring entertaining.
It’s utility for the original purpose, communication without limits, (or checking for coffee) is being diminished, and at some point, ill stop using it for that. But as long as there are jokes and titties, it will still be a source of entertainment.
I find it hard to believe that it’s legal to buy a company, but not it’s contractual obligations. Seems line a hell of a loophole for getting out of things you don’t want to do.
Ain’t she a beaut?
So you don’t want our opinions, do you? You just want people to agree with you.
His thoughts seem to be that they share almost no characteristics, no philosophical underpinnings, and that there seems to be no direct path from the one to the other.
What do you think a discussing of “proto-X” is going to look like, if not comparing it to other things looking for similarities and possible links?
I have several 300 gallon mixers at work, and a QA lab. If the mixer won’t do the job, I’ll just pour acids in until it is reduced to soup.
Then I’m fleeing the country because maintenance will make the eldrich horror look like the easy choice.
This was the statement at the top of this discussion. It values the local concept of what time should be over an objective measurement of what time is.
The proposed change wouldn’t cause much of a problem. But the idea under the statement I quoted would.