• 0 Posts
  • 15 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 13th, 2023

help-circle










  • Takumidesh@lemmy.worldtoAsklemmy@lemmy.ml*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    But live/real time text communication with relatively informal conversations is new.

    Going back 100 years, if you were writing text to have a conversation you were likely sending a letter, this asynchronous communication method means that you were putting more time and effort into each message as it was a lot of effort to get the message to another person (even if that is just hand delivering it to your neighbor)

    You also weren’t expecting immediate responses. The expectation is that a decent amount of time is going to pass before the next phase of the conversation.

    Instant messaging is basically brand new as far as the history of written language goes. So with it comes new paradigms in discussion.

    Emojis offer a great way to express emotions that succinctly convey a lot of information. Great for back and forth conversations.

    Being able to react to a message with 👍 is awesome and really not much different from all of the other initialisms that have been developed on the Internet over the years.





  • Takumidesh@lemmy.worldtoAsklemmy@lemmy.mlDo you consider AI art “OC” ?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why is it actually different?

    If I study a painting (train a model) and then replicate the style am I stealing the painting off of an artist?

    If I illegally obtained a copy of the painting that i studied, would the piece that I generated belong to the artist of the painting i studied?

    If I go to a wine and design thing and paint a picture after being instructed how and following specifically with a template, does that make my painting no longer mine?

    Is a person sitting in a free museum sketching in their notebook, a version of the painting that they see on the wall stealing?

    Ai is not copying, the work that it generates is novel. The training data may have been obtained illegally (debatable and not settled in law) but that doesn’t make the generated work any less new or novel.

    In your own example, the people who 'went to school and learned from the masters" also don’t pay the original artists. Art students aren’t paying the Gogh estate for permission to study his paintings and they aren’t paying royalties for making something that looks and feels like his paintings either.