For something to be deleted on the fediverse you would need to have no instance and no followers lol
Friends don’t let friends use proprietary software.
https://mastodon.social/@thann
https://gitlab.com/thann
For something to be deleted on the fediverse you would need to have no instance and no followers lol
9 out of 10 porn bots prefer X
I already have the stuff setup, you can mail them to me and I’ll mail the minis back =]
What gender is the wheel user?
Wheel never know!
Just like you could “delete” photos
What the fuck do you mean “autonomously”?
Like nobody gave it instructions, but its putting cars together anyway?
That is the ugliest case I have ever seen! Dip that removed in acetone…
Mumble hasn’t fed any of my data to a megacorp!
Are you like trying to keep my unemployed?
Last time I bought this up, everyone thought I was lying because they couldn’t believe the thought of their beloved status symbol not being perfect.
Its important to remind people that apple cares about your security and privacy as much as zuckerberg.
So youre suggesting that if someone says I wasn’t speeding we should disregard the audio tape of me bragging about speeding?
what? youre talking about the joemygod(dot)com article?
its pretty biased and if you read the pdf you can search for Zwonitzer:
you can find tons of examples of biden bragging about having the classified material. So its pretty well-established that joe had the info and knew he had the info. so he broke the law.
yeah, so the “level of crime” is debatable, but if I kill someone it would not be wrong to say “I broke the law” right?
Maybe it was justifiable, but it is up to a jury to determine guilt.
Really the essence of my question is: “are ‘guilt’ and ‘breaking the law’ seen as different things.”
conversely, if a murderer got acquitted, but then indisputable proof that the were the murder came out afterwards, you would say, “he broke the law”.
how so?
An overwhelming number of people seem to think that either intention or whether you were charged are relevant to the question here:
https://lemmy.ml/comment/8298237
In my opinion, yes. “breaking the law” is a statement of fact that is based on what is actually quantifiable.
The fact that I was traveling over the speed limit is the only relevant factor. My intentions and consequences are irrelevant.
Stop using proprietary bullshit altogether
Yeah… If your government is so poorly implemented you can’t even maintain a mastodon instance, you probably have bigger problems…