5 8 7 2 4 1 6 3

It’s fine to not care about what other people think and engage with the other person in a discussion. Even then, there can still be value in our arguments for the other people on this website with us. Our discourse can be useful.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFpK_r-jEXg

As far this Onion video, we should engage in the relentless pursuit of the truth regardless of other people’s opinions real or imagined. But that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t be grateful when someone is arguing for equality.

The conversations we are having on this public comment section are of course public. This can be observed by the fact that people jump in at different points of the comment chains in this comment section. Not to mention the fact we are having a meta discussion about the discussions. Also, most instances have some form of voting in their default views. So the audience is real.

What I find to be the common misconception is that because we are having this discussion over an artificial medium that somehow cheapens the discourse. However, this is a real discussion with real people about a topic that affects real people.

A primary goal should be to educate people. There’s no reason why the discussion can’t be entertaining. Usually this shouldn’t be at anyone’s expense, however we shouldn’t tolerate intolerant people. The far-right have seen the internet as a serious means of communication and are using it as a way to spread their ideology to devastating effect. Making fun of these intolerant people is a necessary step to preventing the spread of disinformation. But making the argument on its own is great too.

I don’t have the time or the energy to reply to every incorrect take or argument I see on the internet. And I typically read more than I write. That’s probably true of most internet users. So I appreciate it when I see other people pushing back against intolerant ideologies. Especially in this case, where the bad faith was so explicitly apparent. No one person could fight back against the right-wing infosphere by themselves. Defeating intolerant ideologies and educating people is a group effort.

Is a rat’s tail like a monkey’s paw?

Also, I lost track of your username. I thought I was arguing with another person in this chain. So anyway, thanks again! =)

That’s prudish. It’s the 21st century. This is a beach in America and it’s fine.

https://i.insider.com/5773e4c8dd089531228b4d84?width=700&format=jpeg&auto=webp

I want equality for all. You have to work so hard to try to fight that, it’s silly.

What you’re ranting about is what men do all the time all over the place, because it’s no big deal. It eventually will be that way for everyone.

However something tells me that it’s not a problem and most people do not care if it wasn’t ever even voted on.

No, actually people want equality. We’ve been fighting for it for centuries. We’ll be fighting for it as long as there are people who want to take it away.

Loud minority screams “I wanna go naked on the streets”

Men go topless all the time. The fact you need to bend over backwards here is an obvious demonstration that you are not arguing in good faith. @splendoruranium@infosec.pub, do you see what I mean?

“oh no I have to put my shirt on before going out, this is fascism”

More of the same. Really stunning to watch a person tie themselves into knots for the sake of inequality. Some people really do hate women.

Go to the beach and there go topless all you want. That’s what I do anyway. We collectively agreed that this is where it is fine to do so. Or on your property, you can walk even completely naked all you want.

Women should be allowed to go topless wherever men can. See how it’s trivial to describe when the goal is equality. It’s inequality that adds needless complexity.

Radical gender centrist

This really says it all. The word you’re looking for is misogynist.

You being horny isn’t a justification treat women as second class citizens. Grow up.

Because some people are not arguing in good faith. Sometimes it’s best to call them out on what they’re doing so people learn to recognize the behavior.

This comment section is not the first time this topic has been thought about and discussed.

Some of these users are unironically repeating rape cultural word for word and in this case with the add on of “I’m just asking questions”. Thanks for sticking it to them. =)

It is sexist because you’re treating them differently based on arbitrary cultural standards. Why are you pretending made up social constructs are real? We shouldn’t be consistently sexist. We should want equality for all.

Saying ‘women shouldn’t go around topless’ isn’t allowing society to function. It’s sexist and demonizes women’s bodies in a way that promotes violence against women. Deconstruct your society or don’t, but don’t be surprised when you end up in a death camp because you thought it was fine to give second class person status to half your population.

This is what the incoming Trump administration wants to do to the US.

100% I have no confidence in Israel’s ability to comply with international law or humanitarian norms. As a jew, I am less safe because of Israel’s genocide of the Palestinians. There is no interest in self-defense or defeating terrorists. Netanyahu wants to prolong the war to stay out of prison and to create a greater Israel. Israel attacking the UN troops has really ticked me off too.

Now you are ready to enter… the Gungeon

Since her outfit is white instead of black I don’t think I would ever have noticed if it hadn’t been pointed out to me. Nothing wrong with it though, it is mostly funny. XD

BDSM Padmé

I’m not sure it is hyperbole.

This confused me as well so I googled it.

Padmé in BDSM gear

First result

It’s undoubtedly made of some kind of fantasy metal like mithril, orichalcum, or adamantium. So it weighs less than a pen and can cut through solid blocks of steel. It’s not getting stuck in anything let alone something like human bones.

Someone needs to tell that to these guys.

It’s weird how these fictional universes figure out faster than light travel, but not hazmat suits.

Political neuroscience is an interesting field. I remember hearing about similar studies years ago on podcasts. A quick google revealed the field has had numerous studies done in the last year alone.

I don’t feel that this section inherently contradicts what I am trying to say and perhaps is intended to be supporting evidence. The fact that the differences between conservatives and liberals can be measured means that the disagreements stem from a real place. However, the article mentions that this does not mean agreement is impossible. It means that the two groups need to be approached differently with the same information.

Andrea Kuszewski, a researcher who has written about political neuroscience, would rather put a positive spin on what it could mean for politics. She says this kind of knowledge could help open up communication, or at least ease hostility between the country’s two major political parties.

“Each side is going to have to recognize that not everyone thinks like them, processes information like them, or values the same types of things,” she wrote last week. “With the state our country is in right now, I don’t think we have any choice but to cowboy up and do whatever needs to be done in order to reach some common ground.”

Do you mind elaborating on the intention of sharing the quoted section of the linked article? I don’t want to assume and I want to engage with what you mean.