I exist or something probably
Body weight exercises can build plenty of muscle. You only need specialized muscle targeting once you’re body building. For health body weight exercises are ideal, targeting individual muscles is not as useful to fitness as training many muscles in tandem for common movements.
They just smell nice, your skin is dead and you’re not retrieving anything from it. Just eat the fruits and veggies.
All you really need is the Nyquist frequency of human hearing to know. That’s a good breakdown for audiophiles I’m sure but it is broadly as simple as the Nyquist frequency.
At this point I can only determine you are arguing for the sake of arguing.
Much of what you said is very wrong but it’s not worth arguing about.
Or you know, reducing thermal load by using broadly more efficient capacitors allowing you to shove more current in the car. Or by meeting grid scale requirements for car charging by smoothing out the grid impact of a bunch of charging at once. Or any number of benefits.
Ultimately this certainly benefits car charging. It benefits all electronics. No you won’t be getting two second car charges with this.
Almost every electrical system on the planet uses capacitors. Especially high power systems. Of which evs are.
“No real point in mixing capacitors in with a large battery” ?? That’s done literally all the time for both filtering and for intermittent high power output. Like when I say almost every electrical system uses caps, I mean almost every electrical system.
More of an actual comment, good. More efficient capacitors in both speed and heat certainly helps in charging devices of all sizes. Of course it wouldn’t be charging large batteries in seconds, but that doesn’t mean no improvement.
Why do you feel that the researchers are wrong about their physics research?
Fudging isn’t unique to DND, though I agree that people would be better off trying anything else.
The system is a means to an end. No system captures its tone perfectly through mechanics.
Why would librewolf specifically advise that you minimize your extensions to decrease client uniqueness if it had no effect on client uniqueness? Someone’s misinformed, and I don’t think its librewolf.
Those things are not enshittification, enshittification is the process where a service becomes worse as a means to extract more value from users and then shareholders, where user does not just mean the classic consumer but ad sellers, data buyers, etc.
Not all annoying features are enshittification, but enshittification is not just misfeatures.
You may know all this but I felt your comment was not clear enough about the distinction.
Cutting off your nose to spite your face.
Personally the recent sharp and sudden increase in Tankies is likely a symptom or an expression of it. While that could be a knock on effect from astro turfing elsewhere, see my last comment lol
While not going to go digging for any, it seems a tad naive to assume that there will not be any unnatural/paid posting on a platform this open and easy access. You should practice good information hygiene either way.
In chainmail, the war game dnd is historically based on, a hit point is a fraction of a hit dice, each HD represents one soldier, roughly, so 12hp being the average of 4hd isn’t too bad, no.
You’re in fact right, I was hedging a bet that the abundance of aluminum meant it’d be used by some random metabolic processes somewhere, which it probably is, but still none found.
Do you have any sources for this fairly common naturally occurring biologically important, and in human uses bioinert metal causing “light metal poisoning” from either natural background doses or incidental from human pollution?
I don’t want acute poisoning, specifically sources on chronic background doses.
Sometimes relaxing regulatory measures leads to people following them better, as they better match the intent of the regulation rather than being seen as absurd. It also lowers the ‘benefit’ of deviancy from that regulation.
Sometimes you’re right, you regulate more extremely than the intent because people will follow it better, or it makes it easier to enforce.
The point is there’s not a one size fits all.
There are plenty of quantum resistant cryptography methods that already exist and have existed for a decade or more.
No AI are to this level, are a massive security risk, and none are “smart”.
It isn’t.