I don’t remember him speaking like that though! :P
Admin of lemmy.blahaj.zone
I can also be found on the microblog fediverse at @ada@blahaj.zone or on matrix at @ada:chat.blahaj.zone
I don’t remember him speaking like that though! :P
Maybe I’ve just played too much Shadowrun with too many Australians, but lots of them ended up speaking like that, even when they weren’t meant to be Australian! :)
This is not polyamory. This is polygamy. They’re pretty much opposites, because polyamory is about multi partner relations that respect the needs and wants of all of the participants.
Polygamy on the other hand, is only about the freedom of one person (usually a man), and actively restricts the rights of the other participants.
Children tempted to drink gasoline, for example.
Sure. But the goal with kids is to work them towards being able to think for themselves. We guide them until they can, and even then, the guidance should look like rules and guidelines, not indoctrination of thoughts and beliefs.
And lets take your scenario and extend it. Lets say that aliens come along, and they see our planet, and they realise that it’s doomed because if they don’t intervene, scenario X will happen. They can’t solve this for us, so they need us to mobilise to save ourselves.
Aliens that come along and set “rules for our own good”, and enforce certain protective rules and regulations, like strict space parents, but do so without trying to control what we think are more “good” than aliens that indoctrinate away our free will and artificially create “voluntary” compliance.
In the first scenario, the space parents are saving us. In the second scenario, the space parents are replacing us.
It doesn’t matter how you do it, if your goal is to make someone think the way you want them to, rather than trying to get them to think for themselves, it’s the same problem
There isn’t, because installing chips in everyone that effectively over-rides their identity is mutually exclusive with “goodness”
Imagine my surprise when “What could Hamas do to end the violence” wasn’t just an innocent question…
Australian/British slang. It’s a disparaging term for Americans
Starts with rhyming slang
American = Yank Yank = Tank Tank = Septic Tank Septic Tank = Seppo
As I said, yes, a lemmy that bans folk like you is a lemmy that is doing something right
“What could Hamas do to end the violence?”
Nothing else.
And I got immediately banned.
Making excuses for genocide being something that gets you banned is a lemmy I’m fine with
Seppo is a really unfortunate name…
That song is so much better than it has any right to be
And other people deliberately use all of the “come on man” and “Hey mate” and “Dude is not gendered” explicitly at trans people, because it lets them get away with misgendering. So trans people, who experience that stuff every day, can be a little sensitive when someone does that, even if they aren’t doing it deliberately.
In this case, not knowing the person, and not having access to their pronouns, the comment was fine. But once you know it’s an issue, repeating it despite knowing it’s an issue is a shitty thing to do.
It could easily have been anonymised. The conversation can happen without misgendering someone a second time around.
Literally just edit the person’s name out of the image, and boom, same discussion, but this time without repeating the same mistake
Whatever your thoughts on the original situation, you know her pronouns now, and you’ve directly reposted the thing that got you banned. This time around, you don’t have an excuse. You know that it’s an issue, but you didn’t anonymise the post, effectively sharing the misgendering with even more people
Pushing the boundaries of the question, but 40k orks! How can you not love the big green lugs?
Fricken’ dinosaurs with fricken’ sword arms.
The undersells them by a lot! That makes them sound comparable to Deathclaws in Fallout, but K’chain Che’malle scared gods!
I don’t even know if I am autistic, let alone where it diverges from my ADHD or how it differs from the experiences of other ND folk.
It could be an indian runner duck with a short beak
Because it pretends to be different to the centralised corporate social media platforms, whilst giving the cohesive experience of a centralised platform