Thank you for the source.

% xan select issue_stance issue_stances.csv | rg 'prioritize investment in nuclear energy'
"The U.K. should prioritize investment in nuclear energy as part of its Net Zero strategy, even if this requires significant upfront costs.  "
"The U.K. should prioritize investment in nuclear energy as part of its green energy strategy, even if it requires significant upfront costs.  "
"The U.K. should prioritize investment in nuclear energy as a reliable low-carbon energy source, even if it delays renewable energy advancements.  "
"The U.K. should prioritize investment in nuclear energy as a reliable alternative to diversify the utility market, even if it leads to higher initial costs.  "
"The U.K. should prioritize investment in nuclear energy as a low-carbon power source, even if it means delaying the decommissioning of older reactors."

That explains it.

I skimmed through the PDF, and didn’t find more info about the 700+ supposed “political” issues, other than that they relate to the UK somehow.

What could those issues be? Like, try to enumerate all supposedly “political” issues in your head, and you will get to stuff like “compassionate death” (a still debated topic that gets a decent amount of news coverage in the UK), and you would still be nowhere near a 100.

I think using a larger number hoping for a larger impact may have backfired 😉, or maybe no one clocked the bullshit.

The proposition that the modern nation state humanoid population is so fundamentally divided and extremely varied in epistemological thought, is itself a hilarious one to begin with of course.

this is funny because why even protest in the us. the attitude would be one of completely giving up.

What’s really really funny is how it’s easy to see the applicability of “a proper diagnosis is the first step to a successful treatment” in all contexts, except this one.

Not only are facts ignored/glossed over/danced around to convince people to believe in an ineffective treatment, but everyone must also believe, with a lot of gaslighting if needed, that the blue cancerous cells in the uniparty cancer will somehow produce an amazing cure.

“Nazi Bar” analogies are also somehow appropriate to push everywhere, except the congress, the senate, …

People who actually care about Palestine with moral consistency, know the uniparty for what it is. In fact, they know post-WW2 America itself for what it is, the primary worldwide genocider. They also know that it wasn’t a random change in direction.

And it would have been funny the irony of talking about literally anything else being inorganic in the last election, other than Kamala’s manufactured and fake popularity, that is if the world situation wasn’t as sad as it is.

But hey, if such coping delusions make you and others feel better, …