I mean, you can simply define something differently than the last 50 years of researchers in computer science. It’s just not going to make a difference.
I mean, you can simply define something differently than the last 50 years of researchers in computer science. It’s just not going to make a difference.
JavaOS
No 16 gigs is ok for an LLM
On your gpu
I’ve developed “AI” using prolog.
No machine learning, you’re still solving problems using logical reasoning and deduction that’s not intuitively obvious for humans.
Machine learning isn’t the only form of AI.
May I interest you in firefly III?
From what I understand you obfuscate the port in order to limit the amount of incoming attacks. But then fail2ban would be a much more effective tool.
The disinterested aspect you described is the actual problem. Because it’s based on the assumption your port won’t be found, but it definitely will, and as soon as that happens you’ll end up in a database such as shodan and the entire effect is GONE.
Obfuscation is not security, changing the port doesn’t increase your security
Exactly, why would they even put napkins out if the customers still come.
Where you put it is not my problem.
The general census is that latex actually is an example of programming languages sharing semantics with non programming languages and not being intend as a programming language.
since you linked to wikipedia:
The domain of the language is also worth consideration. Markup languages like XML, HTML, or troff, which define structured data, are not usually considered programming languages.[12][13][14] Programming languages may, however, share the syntax with markup languages if a computational semantics is defined. XSLT, for example, is a Turing complete language entirely using XML syntax.[15][16][17] Moreover, LaTeX, which is mostly used for structuring documents, also contains a Turing complete subset.[18][19]
Sometimes even non Turing complete languages are considered a programming language but Turing completeness usually is the criteria agreed upon:
The majority of practical programming languages are Turing complete,[5] and all Turing complete languages can implement the same set of algorithms. ANSI/ISO SQL-92 and Charity are examples of languages that are not Turing complete, yet are often called programming languages.[6][7] However, some authors restrict the term “programming language” to Turing complete languages.[1][8]
SQL is turing complete
This.
Highlight important aspects of the worry with caps
Every charging cycle ages the battery but worrying about it really isn’t worth the hassle.
Ich finds ja witzig wie der Ansporn ist mehr Kinder zu zeugen, während es jetzt schon nicht ordentlich klappt Schulkapazität bereitzustellen.
Und dabei ist das eigentlich Recht leicht abzuschätzen wie viel Kitaplätze man in ungefähr 6 Jahren benötigen wird…
As a full stack developer I switched to a different company with about 30% less pay but 50% more creative freedom.
Best decision of my life.
Mal ganz abgesehen davon, dass die Y-Achse der rechten Grafik offensichtlich nicht bei 0 beginnt.
I vote for naming this branch “mommy”, since all other branches are it’s offspring, and related to it.