Person die 1984 lesen soll = Person die 1984 als Anleitung versteht

-> Man sollte 1984 als Anleitung verstehen

Wenn du Vollzeit Mindestlohn arbeitest erhältst du 12*40*4.345 = 2085€ im Monat.

Ohne Kinder kommst du mit 1000€ easy klar (auch wenn du alleine wohnst), und du bekommst (auch nach Abgaben) noch deutlich mehr als das.

Wissensabfrage ist sowieso sinnfrei

I have no idea what you are trying to say.

Maybe read it again, in context, and decide if there are equal rights to initiate that particular interaction (no matter what the genders or sexualities involved are).

Are you saying that two people, no matter the genders or sexualities, never have the same right to initiate undressing in front of each other? What?

Then have a stern word with yourself about being so incredibly defensive that you end up portraying yourself as a sex pest.

Defensive? I’m neither a gay man nor a heterosexual woman. This doesn’t affect me at all.

it was always initiated by them

Did you mention this randomly or do you believe that you have less right to initiate that than they do?

Riot Games behaves terribly?

Du kannst in Element Videoanrufe machen und deinen Bildschirm teilen.

You seem to be missing my point.

This tool would not increase censorship.

Admins are already able to implement all censorship they want.

Admins are already able to block left-wing opinions, right-wing opinions, child porn, normal porn.

And that already happens.

Lots of instances (like feddit.de) block pornographic content.

Lots of instances (like lemmy.blahaj.zone) block right-wing content.

It is already possible, and it is already happening.

An AI which can detect CSAM (and potentially other content) won’t change that. It will simply make the admins’ job easier.

I don’t know how you get the impression that this increases censorship.

Instance admin already manually block content. And they are already able to do that to any extend they wish to do.

This tool would simply automate that process.

Admins would not gain or lose any ability to block content. Identifying child porn would simply be easier.

(Imagine an admin going to their database and doing a CTRL+F with the term “child porn”, and then going through the posts to find offending ones. But instead of CTRL+F it’s an AI.)

(For some reason I don’t get a notification when you answer my comment. Is that a known issue? Did you block me or something?)

A. If you want to hop you can already just create a new account. What’s the issue with taking ownership of your posts with you?

B. Just migrate the salt, too. A server can have per-user salts, which may be migrated together with the hash.

C. If you already have control over someone else’s account, what additional benefit does migrating serve?

That’s not the point. Yes, child porn sites can host child porn. Other sites/instances can’t stop that. But what other instances can stop, is redistributing said child porn. And for that purpose, such technology would be useful.

You moved the period in the wrong direction. It’s 0.034462%.

Governments like the EU do not just regulate to gain power. No need to spread disinformation just so you can be more pessimistic.

Why don’t you use the Software App for installing Apps?

The issues with games usually arise because people try to run games made for Windows on Linux. Just like you can’t run Linux games on Windows (unless you use WSL, which is just straight up running Linux), you can’t easily run most Windows games on Linux.

No Valorant on Linux :(

What software were you trying to install that you couldn’t install by simply clicking the install button in the software store?

Ich finde, dass der Genderstern tatsächlich unsinnig umgesetzt wurde.

Nehmen wir etwa “Arbeiter*innen” als Beispiel.

Hierbei soll der Stern ja dafür stehen, dass man einen beliebigen Suffix einsetzen kann.

Nehmen wir als Beispiel nichtbinären Suffix mal “-ix”, also dann “Arbeiterix”.

Wenn man bei “Arbeiter*innen” den Stern durch “ix” ersetzt, erhält man “Arbeiterixinnen”.

Das ist unsinnig. Es wird also erwartet, dass der Stern und das “innen” ersetzt wird. Es folgt also doppelt nicht den Konventionen.

Deutlich sinniger (und auch inklusiver) wäre “Arbeiter*”.

Bei dieser Form könnte man jeden Suffix sinnig einsetzen.

Frauen würden *=“innen”, Nichtbinäre (zum Beispiel) *=“ix” und Männer *=“” wählen.

Es macht bei jeder Anwendung Sinn.

Aber nicht nur wäre diese Form sinniger, sie ist auch besser anwendbar.

“Arbeiter*” ist einfacher zu sprechen als “Arbeiter*innen”, da man keine Pause in der Mitte des Wortes einlegen muss.

(Ein weiterer Vorteil wäre, dass unsere vorige Form schon recht nah dran ist, einfach die Grundform zu verwenden, und die Umstellung dementsprechend deutlich einfacher wäre.)

There’s difference in disagreeing in opionion and thinking someone is just wrong. In the latter case, I find it reasonable to suppress their comment using downvotes.