i no read qr

Not sure but I think because water sticks to surfaces and pulls on other water molecules. I think this is what the capillary effect is based upon. Thus also (partly) how trees get their water upwards, and how sponges absorb water

you mean I should’ve called it the “dark web”? I just wanted to imply that “dark web” is a subset of “deep web” in the sense that it is not searchable by regular search engines, thereby including “dark web” to the “deep web” set. But regardless, leak dumps can be found in both places, right?

Not if you cross reference the IP with data leaks on the deep web, revealing way more or other personal info

Super cool, but is it also completely self-hostable?

You hate doing math?

If I touch furniture, I also need to touch it with my other hand at least once

Calling communities subs is fine. It need not necessarily refer to reddit. Sub means under/secondary/part of.

Depends on the person. If you’re happy living in wonderland, theism is the way to go

this settings page does not exist on desktop, only on the mobile version. If I go to en.m.wikipedia.org I can see it on desktop, but it’s not on en.wikipedia.org. It also does not save settings from mobile version to desktop version…

weird

other languages are just guinea pigs for the English wiki I gather

is there no overhaul to copy ideas from one to another? Or overseer to somewhat keep a consistent theming?

using the browser zoom makes the layout narrower again, as if it’s actively trying to reverse the wide layout by the button in the bottom right. It makes the page very weird looking. Just far from ideal.

EDIT: it’s also very inconvenient since my browser saves the zoom level per website (not between en.wikipedia and nl.wikipedia) so the zoom would always be off when going from one article to one in the other language.

yea I guess it has a visual ring to it

well the english wiki does have the wide layout option through the square button on the bottom left, ever since the new layout revamp. Just not the font size option.

you’ll see opinions here on lemmy that generative AI can make novel creations that indicate true creativity…

Yeah I’m not jumping that bandwagon yet, but I think no one is able to determine either side of that. It makes terrific art, so it’s not out the realm of impossibility. The only sensible stance we can take right now, is none, and just wait and see whether AI art can hold up in the long run.

Taking any serious stance right now a priori would be illogical. I don’t understand the fuss people make it out to be. Yes, artists will suffer financially and will therefore limit their time investment and advancements in art, but sacrificing or halting the development of AI for them is also not a possibility. So yes, artists are fucked right now, but there is nothing we can do about that right now. Hopefully, some UBI, but that’s not here now.

But yes, companies deceiving and not warning about the hallucinations of AI, is bad. But it’s not their fault people believe stupid shit because they have always believed and will always believe stupid shit.

2…

what are you whining about? Hallucination is inherently part of LLM as of today. Anything out of this should not be trusted with certainty. But employing it will have more benefits than just shadowing it for everyone. Take it as an unfinished project, so ignore the results if you like. Seriously, it’s physically possible to actually ignore the generative results.

“Absolutely sued” my ass

If this is a phone I’d buy it instantly