I’ve had the opposite experience. The older the pasta, the longer it takes to cook. If it cooks faster, that suggests to me that it has absorbed water during storage, which allows harmful bacteria to grow and the pasta might actually be expired.
Same. That’s when everyone else goes to sleep and actually leaves you time to focus on your work.
I do bake quite a bit. And I don’t do my mise-en-place either when it comes to baking, but that’s not a problem. The way recipes are formatted works well for my process as well. I read through the steps ahead of time if it’s a recipe I am unfamiliar with, then I’ll just have the ingredients list open while I’m doing the prep. The things I make are pretty basic (cookies, cakes, muffin, etc) and the steps are all identical. Mix wet, mix dry, mix everything, bake.
I personally find that having less repeated information makes things easier and faster to read. The recipe says “add flour”, you know that it’s all the flour. If the recipe says “add flour (1 cup)”, then I have to check back in the ingredients list to figure out if that’s all the flour or only part of it. Then the more info you add to clarify, the harder it is to skim while you’re cooking.
Edit: I just noticed this comment wasn’t directed at me. Regardless, I think it’s still relevant.
To the best of my knowledge, this information only exists in the prompt. The raw LLM has no idea what it is and the APIs serve the raw LLM.
Normally, portioning out the ingredients would be the first step of the process and is all done at once.
I’ve always interpreted it as being equivalent to “what’s done is done”
Valid opinion on the phrasing. Disagree with the premise that anything someone says is necessarily their opinion.
Example: “For me, potatoes are easier to peel with a knife than a potato peeler” vs “Potatoes are easier to peel with a knife than a potato peeler”. The former says that this is my experience and yours may differ. The latter says that this is true in general and if you find it easier the other way, there’s a good chance you’re doing something wrong.
Quickly filtering out a subset of them to prioritize so that we get the most value possible out of the time that humans spend on it.
LLMs cannot:
LLMs can
Semantics aside, they’re very different skills that require different setups to accomplish. Just because counting is an easier task than analysing text for humans, doesn’t mean it’s the same it’s the same for a LLM. You can’t use that as evidence for its inability to do the “harder” tasks.
Sounds to me like a 50% improvement over zero human eyes.
It certainly would be. Thankfully, there’s many more than zero human eyes involved in this.
Considering that it’s a language task, LLMs exist, and the cost, it’s a reasonable assumption. It’d be pretty silly to analyse a bag of words when you have tools you can use with minimal work with much better results. Even sillier to spend over $200 for something that can be run on a decade old machine in a few hours.
Yeah, this sounds like something I’d find at a diner.
Possible. I haven’t been following them that closely.
I never implied that we didn’t. I’m telling you that we can always measure something and asking you to clarify which of these measurements constitute brainwave activity. Is the activity in the ovum a brainwave? Is it after the first signs of a notochord? After the notochord disappears completely? First cell to differentiate to eventually become part of the neural tube? When the neural tube starts bulging out? When there’s enough bulging to see three district vesicles? Or five? Appearance of the first neuron? Or when neurogenesis stops? Or when the nervous system is sufficiently developed to take control of certain bodily functions? Or the activity when the nervous system is “fully developed” as an adult? Or something else?
You can measure electromagnetic activity in an unfertilized egg. The question is when does this activity become brainwave activity.
There’s been two cases of this happening very recently that’s been making the rounds on Lemmy. Two dudes on death row, new evidence comes up that puts their guilty judgement into question and their execution proceeds anyway.
At what point would you consider it to be sufficiently brain so that its activity is brainwave activity?
Same here. That’s why I try to stock up on more than I think I’ll need when things go on sale.
I can’t tell if you’re trying to say Alpine skiing is scary or that you’re into all the stuff people consider to be extreme sports.
I train primarily for powerlifting, secondarily for hypertrophy. At a high level, that means my workouts are organized such that each day focuses on one of the three main powerlifts (squat, bench, deadlift), plus accessory exercises to address weak points.
You might enjoy something similar if
Join us at !https://lemmy.world/c/fitness if you have further questions
That’s kind of an odd question. I’m not sure what kind of answer you’re looking for. People choose exercises based on goal, the available equipment, and ability to perform the exercise. So I’ve never seen anyone do a belt squat in person because I’ve never been to a gym with belt squat equipment. I don’t see many people do front levers because few are able to do them.
If you have a particular problem with meeting your macronutrient goals, then that might be a more concrete question to pose. I feel like this is a bit too individual to give you anything useful. Tracking, I do with Macrofactor. It’s a paid app.