What moral code is that, that I am supposed to be promoting?
It is a philosophical argument, not a moral one, to argue that the animals we create are morally equivalent to the children we create. The animals we create have all the same moral qualities as the children we create. Any argument that applies to one then applies to the other. Your personal moral code can tell you what to do with that, but you don’t even need to have a moral code to recognize that the equivalence exists.
There are factual, not moral arguments that animals experience suffering the same way we do, using the same brain structures we use, and that they have experiences at all. There is no hint of morality in this argument.
It is a psychological and spiritual claim, not a moral claim, that engaging in violence and cruelty is harmful to us.
Do you have a logical argument that contradicts anything I said? Because that would have been a much better place to start. The suggestion by making this post that I am trying to “enforce” my personal moral system on others is rather rude.
It isn’t so much a front end as a privacy-enhancing proxy service. You can’t participate, you can only consume. If our governments are going to conduct their interactions with us on fucking Twitter, we need services like this. Or we need our states to stop neglecting our need for online infrastructure and punting to capital interests.