Oooof, I hear that. Things are more political than ever at my work and it’s like, I just want to do my job and go home
Oooof, I hear that. Things are more political than ever at my work and it’s like, I just want to do my job and go home
spend the holidays watching it over and over again
Have these people never met people before?
Yup, Star Trek: Deep Space Nine theme song as my alarm, 5 years and counting
I’m already amazing at emails and summaries, I can write my own code but rarely need to outside my job, I don’t have a use case for translation, I don’t use my current phone assistant and can’t see myself using a “true” virtual assistant.
Got any better scenarios? Cuz all those use cases fill me with apathy.
May I inquire what you think we’ll be using it for?
I don’t care about AI.
It’s not because of posts like this; it’s not because of the endless hype cycle. It’s not because hundreds of billions are going into it and it’s not because everyone’s doing it; it’s all these things combined with the fact that I don’t have a use case for AI in my life. I don’t need AI’s sanitized, corporatized opinion on anything, and there’s nothing a chatbot can do that a human can’t do better.
But that’s just me. If you and others like it, Cool Beans.
That’s some hostile workplace kind of BS, and shouldn’t be tolerated. Document everything, names, dates, info etc.
Build personalities from childhood onwards, so as they get older they already possess personalities instead of being vapid empty shells of humanity
Our civilization is more than capable, but those who have money and power are unwilling, because that’s not something they’re interested or invested in.
One of my favorite moments from last summer was sitting on my back patio watching a hummingbird flying circles around my back yard in the dying light of sunset, gobbling up insects with every lap. Adorable.
They also repeatedly killed wasps that were attracted to the sugar water from the feeder I set up for them, that was pretty fun to see
Heck yeah! I’d even do it for free
Just gimme that chance
You tooooooooooo
I remember being taught that multiplication was all about “groups of”, so for 3x2=6, 3 groups of 2 equals 6 because you’re summing up the total number of objects in each group.
This makes sense to me, and more importantly, it’s logically consistent. For larger numbers, it’s the same thing; 54 groups of 392, when summed up, total 21,168.
But this garbage? 1x1=2? 1 group of 1 equals 2? That’s not how numbers work.
Depends how fine the grains are
A picture I took from the heights of Pretty River Valley Provincial Park, Ontario, on a rainy Friday afternoon last August, as the clouds rolled across the sky and into the forest
In general, probably.
Locally, depends on the locality
Absolutely! It’s art! Well done, also
Words, possibly numbers, letters, punctuation, and maybe some symbols