The NGO is a decoy organization with exactly the same people (minus one) as the VC funded startup. Go look at the “core spec team” and find out which organization they belong to.
Your information on XMPP seems to be quite outdated. File transfer in XMPP is now mostly done by uploading the file via HTTP and sending the URL. Audio calls are done using WebRTC and work two ways.
Every website has access to the password you use on that website. ALWAYS use unique and randomly generated passwords for every service.
“protocol extensions” (aka: incompatible)
Reality shows that implementations can very well implement the same extensions. If you don’t use extremely outdated clients you will find they do have compatible file transfer and A/V calls. ActivityPub works the same way.
Meanwhile Matrix Ltd. cooks up a completely new, incompatible protocol instead of building upon existing internet standards.
I don’t see the reason we need a venture capital funded bloated protocol anyways. Just switch to XMPP. It’s much more lightweight and it’s the internet standard for instant messaging.
Or just have a bus factor greater than one.
feddit.uk seems to be online.
Please don’t get worked up over a 4chan post…
I will never use any instance that federates with instances that federate with instances not run by someone as a hobby. Imagine what could happen if they threaten us to defederate!
You’re not fooling anyone.
How do you know? We should fix this on the software level.
You can block the entire domain.
So we should defederate because we will have issues defederating due to the amount of content we lose? Isn’t that kind of self-contradictory?
I like your considerations, but there are no conclusions on how users/admins/developers should act to achieve this ideal state.
There should be an option to make posts instance-local for such things.
I don’t see any spam from threads.net.
If a user blocks a domain I suppose their content isn’t send to that server anymore I hope?
I’m not sure I understand your question or why you think of those statements as being exclusive. I will try to answer separately.
is the fediverse a service that should allow Threads/Meta
The good thing about the Fediverse is that it isn’t a single service, but many federated ones. For any single instance, I think not defederating maximizes user freedom: A user who wants to interact with Threads can do so while a user that doesn’t want to see any content from Threads can block their domain.
is it like XMPP and doesn’t have to be popular
I think it’s a little bit different from XMPP, in a sense that the Fediverse is a public space where I communicate with strangers, so I would like it to be popular at least among people with shared interests. For instant messaging I just need my friends there, but sure it would be easier if I didn’t have to show everyone how to create an XMPP address and what client to use.
Easily incorporated into the posts themselves
We should definitely block instances who insert ads into the content. However there is no evidence of threads.net doing something like this.
Not now… But they can easily do it if they get a majority market share. Don’t behave like they want? Defederated from the majority of the content.
They could threaten to defederate from us so we should defederate from them? It makes no sense.
Are you familiar with the story of EEE and XMPP?
XMPP works great, I use it everyday. It doesn’t have to be popular, you only need to convince some of your friends to use it.
The most offensive thing here is the
amount={5}attribute. What is it? It’s not XML.