I hope you were being sarcastic…
I hope you were being sarcastic…
Source, please.
Edit: I read your sources. Very interesting!
it only fuels reading DNA and it’s decoding and replication
and its* decoding and replication
I’ll write to my major this week!
I… actually agree with you. It would be nice to have a cozy indoors public space. Sort of like an “indoors park.” But you’ll have to yell at your city hall reps, not a small business owner who, like us, also has to make a living.
Those scenarios can be solved. From “4-hour sofa slots are reserved for groups of three or more people” to “Sofas are reserved to 1-hour max.”
In the end, as it is now, people are overstaying anyway.
Pro-tip: Even in a loud place you can (and should!) speak with your normal voice (e.g. no shouting) when having your mouth an inch or two from the other person’s ear. They will hear you just fine, even if you can’t hear yourself.
This could be solved by a system of reservations. You know… “Ok, one coffee and a sandwich. You have three seating choices: 15 minutes, 30 minutes and 1 hour. Which one do you want? 30 minutes? Ok! Here’s your hourglass.”
This explains religions too.
“This world is going down to shit. But if you are good*, you’ll go to heaven.”
*good = do as we say.
You have a point. I guess we could compile the decompiled code and compare the binaries.
True.
It could also be purportedly condescending. Still an insult.
Fair point.
But to be fair, “you’re inexperienced” can also be used as an insult.
Of course not. You’re a mango!
Bro still eating mushrooms while typing. Go lie down and play portishead somwehere.
“It would be rude to think that they’re inexperienced. So let’s just say that THEY’RE LIARS!!!”
You’re almost close to self-awareness. But then, not bad for a mango.
Incompetence is fine. Incompetence can come from different sources, including inexperience.
Great. Hallucinated decompiled code.
I’m all for AI, but there’s gotta be a better way for machines to become intelligent. Not just “training and predicting without any thought in the process.”
it’s community
its* community
I’m curious enough to continue the conversation, if only because talking about definitions is interesting. So I’m not being confrontational, I actually want to have a discussion.
You say that all soaps are antibacterial because the result in the end is that no bacteria remains on the hands. I see what you’re saying there. But anti-bacterial soap kills the bacteria, including the remaining ones that couldn’t be removed.
That’s like saying that removing a group of humans based on ethnicity from a region, without killing them, amounts to genocide. Would you say that’s genocide too?* (And I know the comparison is extreme.)
*I think I read somewhere that forcibly removing people from a region amounts to genocide, though. But you know what I mean…