🇦🇺𝕄𝕦𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕕𝕔𝕣𝕠𝕔𝕠𝕕𝕚𝕝𝕖

An onlyfans => ur a hoe An onlyfans subscription => ur a sad idiot Supreme shirt/simmillar => congratulations u could have stapled $50 cash to ur shirt a baby on board sticker => congratulations u wanna tell everyone u fucked at least once

Again ur avoiding the question. Being given additional opportunities is a handout. When such a handout is given based on ur race thats racist.

Db0 isn’t like lemm.ee they defederated more readily and instance ban people for not having a left bias.

Not what I asked. How is giving someone something based upon race not racist?

Please explain how dei giving handouts based upon race isn’t racist?

So if the critique is founded then its not racist? U can find a lot of statistics that are true and would get you called an extreme racist if u said em.

For example is it racist to say that Arabs are more inbred? https://europepmc.org/article/MED/19811666

By your logic its also not racist to say that black people in america commit a disproportionate amount of crime https://crimeresearch.org/2023/11/violent-crime-rates-by-race/

These claims are founded in science and fact so therefore not racist right?

Making distinctions/different rules/different judgements bases upon race and not the content of ones character is racist.

Here’s an argument if ur gonna make distinctions bases upon race ur racist. Thus race based dei is racist. If race based dei isn’t racist then negative comments based upon race also aren’t racist. To have one without the other is simply doublethink.

None of em tbh. I’m in a first world country living a better life than 99.99% of kings and emperors in human history. I have food, somewhere to sleep, and my life is not in danger.

Why ruin that by worrying about shit I have zero effect on?

Its all about pub sub relations. Being on a smaller instance in mastodon means u miss a whole bunch of activity and thus don’t have the full picture.

Lemmy and others have a community which means a community receives an activity and then that community pushes that activity to all its subscribed instances. So in lemmy u need at least 1 user from ur instance to subscribe to a community for its activity to be sent to ur instance.

On mastodon all activity by a user is sent to all instances with at least one user who follows that user. So if nobody on ur instance follows a specific user then their content will never show up on ur instance. Its a difficult problem to solve as u can’t just send all activity to all instances cos that will overload most instances. Their are relays that relay activities from its member instances to other instances but as u would expect the larger the relay the more content u must deal with on ur instance and u can get overloaded pretty quick.

The whole point of federation is to send activities only to instances that need them as not to force everyone to have the entire fediverse on their server and handle and activities from the entire fediverse (one of the reasons bluesky federation doesn’t work for small instances).

What do u mean by identity? Trying to put everyone in an identity box is fucking dumb. Everyone has their own set of beliefs and morals these beliefs and morals fit into many different identity boxes.

Trying to make identity first is only going to drive division and conflict. I think having identity first is the greatest mistake of the current political climate.

For a stable society all that is required is everyone to play by the rules of that society under the threat of violence. That’s essentially what a nation is.

Yeah and a majority of hands you shake have touched a dick.

I took your mother there last night. A real bargain

So an organised resistance of ice (the federal government) from carrying out their duty. On a scale large enough that the local police could not maintain the laws of the nation. Is that of sufficient scale and resistance?

Not sure how u are comparing deportation to death threats? Are u advocating for literally fighting the federal government with force? Cos if so that is by definition a rebellion or at a minimum of an attempted rebellion. You do realise by saying this you have met the requirements for the president to call in the national guard without the governors approval.

“10 U.S.C. 12406,” within Title 10 of the U.S. Code on Armed Services. It allows the president to deploy federal troops in instances of “a rebellion or danger of a rebellion” against the U.S. government.

U yourself just provided evidence to support the use of federal troops.

Sure that officer should probably be fired.

None thankfully. Probably because someone called in the national guard.

So ur advocating for breaking the law if u personally think the law is immortal?

Isn’t that exactly what the jan6 insurrectionists where doing?

Or are you the arbiter of morality and everyone else immoral?

Eat your cake or have it u can’t have both.

Maybe because last time when he didn’t there was an insurrection? Maybe he learned from last time?

We are talking about la here not his other activity.