I introduce another option, as I’m much more detailed than even “1.” I can visualise entire scenes with the background and all, along with other sensory experiences such as touch, taste, and smell with complete realism. Very useful being in engineering. I do watch the referenced content, but it’s more to “enrich the dataset” so to speak, just for inspiration and to provide more details to imagine later. Sometimes I’ll just turn it off and go with the fantasy instead.
Where do you live that you just get these adorable things in your planters? I need. Here I just get the occasional rabbit or trash panda.
Nawwww I cute as fuck. You sure you want this candy though? Bc this one comes with nuts…
Is this how you get Heimdal? (mythologically “the Son of 9 mothers”)
Valid, but I do believe you’re overthinking a forced star wars pun…
Exactly. The fallacy of undistributed middle is strong with this OP…
All stupid people are no-sayers. (DU) You are a no-sayer. (DU) Therefore you are a stupid person. (DU) AAA syllogism - invalid due to above fallacy.
“The middle term must be distributed at least once.”
All !do is do not (!do); all do is do. [law of non-contradiction]. All try = do or !do [succeeds or fails, proven by observation]
Therefore, no try != Not (do or !do)
Therefore try is a useless term / there is no distinct “try” that is neither do nor do not.
One must do or do not; there is no try.
Quod Erat Demonstrandum
I find the opposite to be true for me, but I’m the type that will sit down and read a textbook for entertainment as well. Purely informative podcasts, not entertainment etc. I’ve learned a lot of philosophy and ancient history via Spotify actually, it’s a very useful medium for information access, for those so inclined.
Probably one of those acts where they fit a ridiculous number of clowns into one tiny clown car.
Duolingo probably has an accreditation programme by now, considering most high schools use it.
First of all, domes in general aren’t a great idea except for maybe greenhouses - at least on planets in our system. NASA and ESA have done some cool concept experiments as to what pressurized architecture could look like, and it’s a lot more like a cross between a space station module and Earth architecture.
Second - assuming we’ve adapted/evolved to the low gravity, skyscrapers are probably the way to go. That said, if we’ve adapted that heavily we probably have similar adaptations to the atmosphere etc. - in which case architecture would probably be similar to Earth architecture, but able to build higher assuming the same materials.
But if we were trying to colonize a low-gravity world, we’d have to use an orbital station with centripetal-force “gravity” and only research stations on the surface, with a science crew rotation every 6-12 ish months to prevent bone loss.
This is actually the plan for the Moon and then Mars - use Gateway as a station to resupply and host crew rotations for Moon and Mars missions, and eventually to support long-term habitation. But until such a station exists, Lunar Gateway will be used for a waystation for crew rotations between the Moon and Earth.
Space engineering is about to become a very high demand field, on the absolute frontier of human exploration…
So a mango durian but less putrid and more… tropical. Interesting.
Stackoverflow is platonism for the masses, a means by which to copy perfect code from “programmers.”
The “other programmers” are dead. There is no perfect algorithm. And so we must become programmers unto ourselves…
Fraturtlotl
5 more minutes, the force needs…
… we will not let you go!
let me go!!!