Implement a critical vulnerability, have it be pointed out, insist it isn’t their responsibility, refuse to fix it.

Now I feel bad. I was being facetious.

Why do we need three different words for the same thing?

I think you skipped part of the sentence.

I think they’re referring to the online experience. Every single post about some “woman who does something intelligent / skillful”, with enough attention (and it doesn’t take much!), will contain guys being absolute shits.

Seems like the confusion can be attributed to assuming the discussion was limited to “being outside”.

Not to mention that you know that exact typeface and pixel perfect location where letters can be, so it should be relatively easy to go through each possible subsequent character and match the pixelated value.

Certain types of advertising is illegal where I’m from. In particular: political adverts of any kind, and ads that target children.

I probably wouldn’t go much further than a couple of hours drive. The mindset of travelling half the world “just cuz we can” has become unpleasant.

It’s actually a bit refreshing for the US president to be so dumb as to say the quiet parts out loud.

That is the eventual conclusion of capitalism, the way it is currently set to play out.

The only forces that could act against it depend on the distribution of critical information… And those are owned by the same private interests… Soooooo. We’ll see. Doesn’t bode well at all.

Out of curiosity, were you of voting age in 2016?

I don’t see what the big deal is. This is just a Roman roof shape.

I have never seen a clearer divide and correlation between the value I observe being produced, and those that don’t understand the limitations and value of LLMs.

It’s exhausting, because, yes, LLMs are extremely valuables, but only as so far as to solve the problem of “possible suggestions”, and never as “answers and facts”. For some reason, and I suppose it’s the same as for why bullshit is a thing, people conflate the two. And, not just any “people” either, but IT developers and IT product managers, all the way up. The ones that have every reason to know better, are the ones that seem to be utterly clueless as to what problems it solves well, what is irresponsible for it do be used for, correctly evaluating ethics, privacy and security, etc. Sometimes I feel like I’m in a mad house or just haven’t found the same hallucinogenic that everyone else is on.

The argument is that the explanation was valid, and whether or not you found it valid, is more to do with your inability to get it. Now, this isn’t saying anything about you, because you might get it. So, the “you”, is not the particular you, but rather “one such that would meet the requirement”. But hey, you do you.

I’ve made no statement about you. So, your response is a bit weird.

Don’t conflate an argument being unclear, with you having trouble understanding it

What does “based” mean to you?

Sure, but, what does that have to do with the AI answer? Wait… Are you an AI?

Hadn’t heard of it before. Searched for it, and came across both Path of Diablo, and Project diablo. Some polls suggested preferring the latter 2:1. I haven’t played D2 in a few decades (sheesh). Any thoughts on comparing those mods?

If there is ever a legitimate use for its absurd existence, it would be in an effort to stop a literal fascist.