• 0 Posts
  • 33 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: August 2nd, 2023

help-circle








  • schnokobaer@feddit.detoich_iel@feddit.deich_iel
    link
    fedilink
    Deutsch
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Von “Kinder werden Sachen die ihnen verboten werden besonders interessant finden” zu “Verbote sind schlecht” muss man mental erst mal springen. Aber Hauptsache man findet sich besser als der Rest XD find ich gut.


  • schnokobaer@feddit.detoich_iel@feddit.deich_iel
    link
    fedilink
    Deutsch
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 months ago

    Pädagogisch vielleicht nachvollziehbar und definitiv tapfer aber aussichtslos und und nicht den gewünschten Effekt erfüllend. Oder denkt irgendjemand Lasse guckt dann wirklich kein RTL 2 nur weil man das dem Kumpel von Lasse sagt? Als ob Lasse nicht absolut danach lechzt Trash TV zu gucken und ungesunde Sachen zu essen und was ihm sonst noch so alles Zuhause verboten wird und wegen sowas nur um so öfter zu dem Kumpel geht wo das erlaubt ist.


  • gas furnance that was somehow under-dimensioned – the idea is that in the real cold days you’d still have the good ole fireplace

    Oddly enough I’ve never encountered that in Germany, I only ever see catastrophically oversized furnaces that start cycling in March… Seems to me plumbers never really worry too much about correct dimensioning, they just put the same 20 kW furnace that they know and love to install in every apartment and single family home. For some it will be somewhat adequate, for some it’ll be oversized, who cares, customers never complain when the furnace cycles, but when it’s too cold, you’ve got a problem. Same as they’re never too worried about finding suitable supply water temps. Just set it to 80 and you’re good, it’s the customer who pays horrendous gas bills, not you lmao. That’s also why everyone thinks their Altbau has to have 80°+ supply water when they have never really tried anything lower to see if it maybe suffices. My parents had their oil-furnace on 80C supply for the past 40 years and last winter when everybody was trying to save as much energy as possible they figured out you can set it to 55 as well.


  • but assuming they’re saying that it’s saying that $0.63 worth of natural gas gives you the equivalent thermal output of 1kWh

    Correct (although $0.063), and interesting to see you seem unfamiliar with this, this is the standard way of listing energy prices in Europe, it’s not just that site. That site was just my first hit when I looked up Canadian energy prices. It’s the low heat value and it’s determined by the energy in a fuel if not allowed to condense (which is the relevant value for a traditional furnace, if you have a more modern condensing furnace you take the high heat value) and it makes it relatively easy to compare different sources of energy.

    Canada is huge, and some of that landmass is in the Arctic circle.

    What people never realise is that being far up in arctic climates doesn’t only impair an SCOP. Yeah the lowest temps are very cold, but that means temporarily bad COPs. An SCOP is made up of the whole heating period though, which in colder climates is longer, so in turn you have several months more of the time where heat pumps are extremely viable with temporary COPs above 5 or 6 saving loads of energy. The real problem is if your lowest temps are so low that a heat pump will stop working entirely, in which case you get a hybrid system or just leave your old furnace in as backup, which is even better for your SCOP because you omit the month(s) with the worst COP and only use the heat pump when it’s most viable. Let’s say you live in Tuktoyaktuk and heating period is basically all year, then you have your furnace on for 3-4 months but you’re saving massive amounts of energy with your heat pump in the other 8-9 months of the year.

    touching on the nuances of the word “efficiency”

    I actually tend to avoid using that term for heat pumps anyway, as it’s not really correct in terms of physics. What makes heat pumps so viable is a coefficient of performance, their actual electrical efficiency isn’t all that good at 50-60%, but it’s also kinda irrelevant. It’s sometimes easier to just call it efficiency, but like you say, once you go into the nitty gritty it falls apart.


  • if your energy cost for that source of power is high, it’s going to lose the financial argument every time.

    How high, is the question. How much more is electricity where you live that heat pumps “lose the financial argument every time”? Where I’m from a kWh of electricity is roughly 2.8-3x that of natural gas, so most modern heat pumps will beat that, some by quite a margin.

    If globalpetrolprices.com is to be trusted and Canadian natural gas is 0.063 CAD and electricity is 0.165 CAD you’re very much in the same boat with a 2.6 ratio. Most heat pumps should be able to beat a 2.6 SCOP even in Canada.

    So, sure, the study only looks at COPs and not at overall cost, but I think it’s not unreasonable to expect home owners to be able to divide electricity price by gas price and compare it to the SCOP of heat pumps on offer.







  • schnokobaer@feddit.detoAsklemmy@lemmy.ml*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    The number of registered cars has risen considerably, even in the last 10 years or so, and cars are getting increasingly bigger. IIRC registered cars in Berlin for instance has risen from 1.2 to 1.4 m in the last decade or so without the city expanding or gaining any meaningful parking space. Law enforcement is typically fundamentally carbrained, so they are lenient on such violations, thinking you can’t punish the poor people who have to park their car somewhere. With modern technologies it could be battled quite effectively, but it’s simply not politically desired in the Autoland. Instead, privacy and bureaucratic overload are made up as excuses on how it’s impossible to get a hold of it.

    I think it goes past mildly on the concern scale. Car centricity in German cities already starkly reduces the quality of life there, and we still haven’t even collectively recognised it as a problem, instead it is still getting worse in 2023.


  • Opposed to running fossile fuels alongside renewables.

    But that’s literally what you’re gonna have to do for 20+ years if you decide to go both ways and also build new nuclear plants. Put all your budget into renewables at once and you instantly cut down on the fossil fuel you’d otherwise burn while waiting for your reactor to go online, all while you’re saving money from the cheap energy yield which you can reinvest into more renewables or storage R&D to eventually overcome the requirement to run something alongside it.