If you can test it on a feature branch then at least you can squash or tidy the commits after you’ve got them working. If you can only test by committing to main though, curse whoever designed that.
If you can test it on a feature branch then at least you can squash or tidy the commits after you’ve got them working. If you can only test by committing to main though, curse whoever designed that.
Aussie, come on man the clue was the OP!
As nobody has posted it yet, this vibe is often referred to as !liminalspace@lemmy.world
“All this water? Yeah, not meant to be here at all!”
I consider myself rationally angry about it!
Bleugh-twit, of course!
Clever, I like it when you have to work a little for the punchline
Wasn’t the whole point of The Mandarin in IM3 that he was a fake?
I guess that’s what instances are trying to avoid by preemptively blocking Threads. If everyone else blocks it then Lemmy carries on existing as it is. And I can’t imagine big corpo wouldn’t want to create their own name.
Either they federate and all their users are exposed to the rest of the fediverse, or they don’t and they may as well be a separate thing
I did a little write-up on it a while back, probably my favourite app, and it’ll run on anything!
I was keeping in mind that they put that much money in, surely all that money has made something playable that would make some money, whereas throwing it all away makes nothing at all, right?
“Certain aspects of Concord were exceptional,” Hulst continued, “but others did not land with enough players, and as a result we took the game offline. We have spent considerable time these past few months exploring all our options [and] after much thought, we have determined the best path forward is to permanently sunset the game and close the studio.”
But why? Did they actually think it was going to cost more money to keep the servers running than it would bring in? What’s the opposite of the sunk cost fallacy?
I guess Everyone is John knew all along
What is “common core” and what is the “line up method”?
Those are quite far from mental arithmetic though
I like your funny words, mathemagic man
Mental arithmetic is all little tricks and shortcuts. If the answer is right then there’s no wrong way to do it, and maths is one of the few places where answers are right or wrong with no damn maybes!
Whoops, I meant “passkey”, I’ll edit my original comment
Why would the artist not just flip the image instead of having the speech bubbles confusingly crossing over like that?