• 1 Post
  • 28 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 11th, 2023

help-circle






  • Nah.
    You’re just taking liberties with your misinterpretations.
    Tho that is fun to do, so nothing wrong with discussing it.

    My method for resolving this would be : Monitor your heart rate and breathing, monitor the heart rate and breathing of a dead person, if they match then sure.

    If you adjusted your analogy to unconsciousness, and compared sleep to something near death, like a coma, braindead person, or something else (idk I’m not knowledgeable about medical stuff) then I think that conversation could go interesting places.

    Good question tho.


  • Wait a minute, you’re telling me you listen and think about things? I bet you even wear glasses. Someone needs a bit more Pol Pot in their lives. /s

    For those who haven’t seen it, I recommend the movie The Killing Fields. If you prefer music, listen to “Holiday in Cambodia”. Same topic in both pieces of media.

    Ever listen to the (Tony Hawk Pro Skater OST) song Police Truck by the Dead Kennedys? Nice lil diddy about police brutality.

    And every 2pac song was talking about what we would consider “modern issues” 35 years ago. But no, all this “woke” stuff just showed up yesterday…





  • And the weapon is ideas? If a society has to shield itself from ideas to prevent revolt, then perhaps that society has bigger problems. Patching the hole as a united bipartisan front, when the ONLY things that receives united bipartisan support is corporate interests, kinda gives their hand away. They’re doing this as a desperation move to prevent societal erosion and more importantly, loss of power in media. I think it’s too late.

    Seems like an upheaval, electorally or otherwise, is at hand and this is a desperation move. I don’t expect the patching to prevent the rain, but who knows.

    My interpretation, open to being wrong.








  • Yes. Like I said I agree with a lot of your points. My examples are intentionally oversimplified to avoid diluting the idea I want to demonstrate.

    I hope you understand that I’m trying to help you communicate more effectively, because i think that what you are communicating is valid.

    Not everything is an argument. It’s important to understand when people are helping you, or you end up attacking allies. We are likely on the same side.


  • I actually agree with parts of your underlying idea, but your tone is so awful that you’re convincing people to disagree with you.

    You could be like : “I believe in cats because of cat videos.”

    But instead you’re like : “What are you? Some kinda ducking idiot? You never seen a cat video? You scared of cats bro?! Small minded population can’t accept cats!”

    Surely you understand tone? I hope you are only like this on the internet.