They’ve lost potential revenue, but that is not the same as if amazon would come to their house and had stolen their only rucksack prototype.
Potential revenue is not your property.
It still sucks though.
They’ve lost potential revenue, but that is not the same as if amazon would come to their house and had stolen their only rucksack prototype.
Potential revenue is not your property.
It still sucks though.
It works great for a closed group of people, all on one instance. Another data point that federation is hard.
This is all hard to do because it is hard to determine people’s race on lemmy. Some usernames give it away but most don’t. And I don’t go snooping trough their post history to find that out.
It started as actual unpublished technical descriptions of underlying technology.
If they made that, they could also make it so one can pay 10x more for each additional icon.
So 10e for one, 100e for two, 1000e for three and so on.
This would allow us to recognise all people seeking attention by flashing money very easily. Bonus points if we are able to filter feeds by number of icons.
Well, lemmy is a place for much more cultured audience. We can appreciate a good shitpost (that does also hold some water).
This is an overstatement, definitely. C is one of the few (mainstream) languages where memory safety vulnerabilities are even possible. So if you batch C and C++ together, they probably cover more than 90% of all the memory unsafe cove written in last 50 years, which is a strong implication that they will contribute to 90% of memory vulnerabilities.
All that said, memory vulnerabilities are about 65% of all high implact vulnerabilities on Chromium project[1] and about 70% of vulnerabilities at Microsoft [2].
You are not alone. This is the work git was built for.
There is a bit of benefit if you have code reviewed so separate commits are easier to review instaed of one -900 +1278 commit.
Wait what? What does that even mean? Is he their boss? Is he paying them? Does he mind control them?
I didn’t even notice the new actors, a testimony to how good they are!
Wait, but if you have, for example an HTTP API and you listen on a unix socket in for incoming requests, this is quite a lot of overhead in parsing HTTP headers. It is not much, but also cannot be the recommended solution on how to do network applications.
Oh shit, the persona guy was right! We should all be adding license to our comments, so could not legally train model that are then used for commercial purposes.
Lol, something felt off, but I just wasn’t sure if I mistyped something until I saw this comment.
This is the real big-endian way. So your things line-up when you have all of these:
file_dialogue_open
file_dialogue_close
file_dropdown_open
file_rename
directory_remove
If I were designing a natural language, I’d put adjectives after the nouns, so you start with the important things first:
car big red
instead of
big red car
Lol. How much time does it take?
Ah yes, the enshitification
Aaah, AI training data. That makes sense now
But whats the point of giving out a license along the comment? Are you giving permission to use your comment?
That’s a valid argument, but a very weak one. If we are not completely sure something is an improvement in all aspects are we just to dismiss it altogether?