![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/170721ad-9010-470f-a4a4-ead95f51f13b.png)
sometimes, a script needs to be edited in a plain text editor, without having access to an lsp or any other dev tools.
sometimes, a script needs to be edited in a plain text editor, without having access to an lsp or any other dev tools.
that’s not how asymptotes work.
but they have a lot more disadvantages for most scenarios (if you’re not a faang scale company, you probably don’t need them)
this has “draw the rest of the fucking owl” vibes to it. especially step 3
m
usually the commits at the end of the day when I haven’t finished a task yet. It will be squashed and disappear eventually.
so, you can get around the burden of proof by getting enough people to perpetrate the lie?
i have one, it’s not very good tbh. You would need to modify the software yourself to make it actually practical. some way to lock the screen, some way to vibrate more than one 250ms blip when an alarm is triggered, stuff like that.
is it just me who hasn’t ever had any bluetooth problems?
could have been between the cat and myself. The cat still gets preference.
the sound one makes while using them
blind people exist.
blind people use computers.
Maybe she’s using accessibility tools to yogacode
i think the real explanation is simpler and more understandable.
NaN is what you get when you do something illegal like dividing by zero. There is no answer, but the operation has to result in something. So it gives you NaN, because the result is literally not a number
and that’s still too verbose. it should be (num % 2) != 0
asm(“nop”);
lots of stuff that “windows can do” is due to 3rd party software too.
lots and lots more IPC. So lots and lots of context switches. So worse performance
about 30 meters. She lives right up the street
so, due to those gaps, it currently can’t do those things.
This argument boils down to “yes it could, if someone bothered to implement it”. Well… nobody has, so it can’t
well, yes of course i trust you less. It’s the whole point of wanting labelling in the first place, so I can know it’s not trustworthy in any way
note: on most computers, it worked the opposite to how one would think. Turning it on slowed your cpu to around 33 MHz