Because it would be immensely stupid

Maybe we can’t but climate change could.

Talk about a loss for all those who voted for irresponsible use of AI /s

And “States” when some are barely

This is what share holder value looks like.

Thank you for explaining that to me and expressing how you feel.

If you want to argue then address the first three sentences rebutting your argument. If you want to express your feelings you address the personal. I gave you both options and you chose the latter. Consider me your free internet schizo therapist.

That’s a non-sequitur. A group of people banding together to protect themselves is not automarically an *archy. Nor does it follow they are secretly in control. I think you are describing your own personal reality then the reality at large. Do women really control your life so much that you feel you are not in control of your own life? Can you cite an example for us to analyze?

Yes this impacts everyone and everyone should be concerned. But the solution is in mass politics, not in “electing” another death cult leader. The conservative framework is fundamentally unable to address this issue.

Edit: after watching the video I would say the title reflects her audience.

That’s the nature of patriarchy. Women are to be protected while most men are disposable.

Would you say women and men are targeted in equal proportions or that one group is targeted over the other based on “perceived value”? Like I am not saying you are wrong, I am just saying, “yes, and”

I mean, why do you think they are targeting women in the first place?

We can simply build the tech then throw the billionaires out.

We did that with the fediverse but the billionaires still control the online conversation.

You’ll be able to interact with your agent through any device, including your glasses to keep you present in the moment with the people you care about.

The guy still thinks his pervert glasses is a product we want. There isn’t a single original thought under that perm of his.

They do have billionaires, but they aren’t calling the shots. Just ask Jack Ma

“Progressive” is born out of trying to rebrand. Whatever label you choose, the media will define it.

You have the media saying empathy is bad. You are never going to win against the media by policing labels, that is what they do. You win by staying on message about the issues and policies.

I’ll do all that when the spec is written in stone.

Sure you can make the technology more resilient but if the enforcement is punitive enough then it won’t matter.

I think https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molly_Ringwald but nothing in the bio makes the reference make sense