One can’t judge a relationship on an image alone but… there’s a few redflags on this one. I hope for you they’re false alarms.

Manual typewriters. You did not precised the age of the technology in question!

Do you knew that there are an average of 1’800 parts in a typewriter? That it can print in two colors, with different margins, different interlinear space, tabulations and that some even have things like word count? It’s a marvelous and yet understandable piece of technology. Someone technically inclined can understand 100% of the working of a typewriter, nobody can understand 100% of a word processor.

In a homebrew setting still in construction, Volapük is the language of a secret society.

Esperanto is more like Common. A language that everyone speaks, more or less, can only be something from an imperialist power or a neutral ground created for that.

Oooh I totally forgot that I did play with MS Paint! I invented cities, countries, or I just did what you described. Fun times!

For the, the main source of proto-fascism is nationalism. The form of governement is secondary.

I am a citizen of two countries: a republic and a monarchy. Both are advanced European liberal democracies.

One has a strong far right, refuse to acknowledge its own regional languages because of the threat they pose to the national unity and has a very strong head of state that can decide a lot of things alone, without being responsible before the Parliament.

The other has almost no far right, a very numerous immigrated population, recognizes three national languages but officially communicates in two other languages spoken by its two biggest immigrated communities, has a weak head of state and a strong Parliament.

Which one is the most “proto-fascist”? The first.

Which one is a monarchy? The second.

My favourite comment is similar: the Firefox/Windows copypasta.

Same, but “as long as I can” generally means a few hours.

Who doesn’t?

It’s all relative in space 😅. But I could reformulate my question: are visible today in our night sky stars that weren’t visible less than 100 years ago?

Are there stars in our sky which are less than 100 yo?

You know everything, apparently.

Pe is the true way.

But we have the Uewersauer lake!

Jlai.lu is more a francophone than strictly French instance, even if as far as I know most admins are French.

Let’s put !luxembourg@lemmy.world in lemmy.dbzer0.com 😁

You don’t think being reified is demeaning?

However:

I suspect your view may be distorted by algorithms feeding you content they expect you to enjoy.

And an accusation. Let’s stop, you don’t discuss in good faith.

I’ll ignore as much parts of your comments as I want when you don’t answer to mine but derail the discussion.

However let’s explain. Porn, in its mainstream form, doesn’t show a sane form of sexuality, where the desires and needs of all participants are met, but shows women as objects of male pleasure. If, from an individual point of view that doesn’t present any problem (I won’t kink-shame women, nor men, nor gender fluid people, who like being sexually reified), as a form of media it normalizes a vision of womanhood as essentially inferior to manhood, as women being necessarily at the service of men, and thus is a product and reinforcement of rape culture.