I’ve never completely understood this, but I think the answer would probably be “no,” although I’m not sure. Usually when I leave the house I turn off wifi and just use mobile data (this is a habit from my pre-VPN days), although I guess I should probably just keep it on since using strange Wi-Fi with a VPN is ok (unless someone at Starbucks is using the evil twin router trick . . . ?). I was generally under the impression that mobile data is harder to interfere with than Wi-Fi, but I could well be wrong and my notions out of date. So, if need be, please set me straight. 🙂

  • dfyxA
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    While my threat model is not universal, it comes close, at least for the average user which OP seems to be from their question. In practice, there is very little unencrypted traffic these days and in the case of that traffic you will have to ask yourself if your (commercial) VPN provider is more trustworthy than your ISP.

    If you need to ask if you need a VPN there’s a 99% chance that you don’t. There are certainly a few use cases for both commercial VPNs and TOR (see my other comment) but to even be aware that those apply to you, you probably already have enough technical knowledge to approach the question from the direction “I want to do XYZ, how can I be more secure?” and not “I’ve heard of VPNs, do I need one?”

    • eleitl@lemmy.ml
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      My national government has no business knowing which protocols I use to contact which endpoints and tamper with that traffic. Wrapping up that information in a tunnel is a good first protection layer.

      • dfyxA
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        If you’re using a commercial VPN from a provider who can legally operate in your country, your national government can just as easily get that information from them as from your ISP.

        • jet@hackertalks.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          Correct. But that’s no reason to make it easy for them. Burglars can break my windows and climb through and steal my stuff. I’m still going to lock my doors

        • to55@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          While ISPs are in many jurisdictions obligated to log your connections (data retentions laws), VPN providers are not.

    • jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Even though most data traffic is encrypted who you’re talking to is not encrypted.

      So a third party can observe, who you’re talking to, how much data you’re sending to them, how frequently you talk to them…

      The classic example is if you start visiting a suicide prevention website, even though they don’t know the content that you’re being served, they can guess oh you’re having mental issues. We should revoke your security clearance… Etc

    • to55@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s not just all about encrypting traffic. Many people connect to the internet over a static IP most of the time from their home network. A VPN provides protection against tracking in this case.