• mozz@mbin.grits.devOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        If “accused” means “charged” then absolutely not. Local police have, as they generally do, charged protestors with some selected kinds of nonsense whether technically-valid or not, in addition to just roughing them up and arresting them and then admitting they didn’t do anything wrong and letting them go.

        The federal government has bought into a certain amount of the propaganda and said some ignorant shit, and hasn’t been doing much to discourage the police from doing that, but as far as I’m aware, “antisemitism” in the current propaganda construction is still perfectly legal and likely to remain so (whatever non-binding resolutions congress wants to make about it.)

          • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I can accuse you of all sorts of things, like being “anti-semiticist.” That doesn’t mean much. If you don’t see the distinction between that and being charged with an actual crime then there isn’t much I can do to help you here.

          • mozz@mbin.grits.devOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            The Tucker Carlson thing only works when you can Just Ask Questions in a place where people can’t ackshually provide the answer.

            • applepie@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Trucker? Why is u looping in pootin’s lapdog here?

              While my statement was hyperbolic, your additional context doesn’t make it look any better but I do appreciate the input so people can see for themselves :)

              • mozz@mbin.grits.devOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                I looped in Tucker because it kinda looked like you asked a question implying a certain answer, and then tried to make fun of me when I provided the answer (which was different than the one you implied).

                No?

                • applepie@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  You literally confirmed by second statement but in order to save face, you swapped accused with charged.

                  So you misstated my position and then proceeded to take it down?

                  That’s a bad faith actor behavior, achshually ;)