Have you went down any internet rabbit holes only to come out with a deep set existential crisis? If so, what are they?

  • Mrs_deWinter@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    Random behavior of subatomic particles doesn’t make free will any likelier either though.

    If they act at random on a makro level their randomness would average out to zero. And that actually checks out, since the mechanical forces of the atomic and molecular level are known, observable, and provable. An apple drops from the tree to the ground, every time. Causality is still a thing, even if not observable at the subatomic level.

    The only way to imagine a subatomically based free will would be some mechanic over which we, at will, could change the randomness of subatomic particles to behave in a predictable pattern and on a scale that’s grand enough to make the proverbial apple fall upward. Or at least make or synapses do something that they physically speaking wouldn’t have done otherwise.

    Free will is as likely as magic. In fact it would actually be some form of magic - a volitional breach of causality itself.

    • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      on a scale that’s grand enough to make the proverbial apple fall upward

      Not necessarily. An apple teetering on the edge of a cliff requires no grand change in initial conditions to have two very different journeys. If “you” are a metaphysical entity capable of altering the signals in your physical brain, your brain could deterministically amplify and enact your will, like gravity does to the apple on the cliff. If you have a metaphysical existence, this is a pretty reasonable mechanism for it to work.