Just saw a post on reddit alternatives and there was a comment inviting users to laguna.chat. I went and checked it out and the trending communities list included, ‘jews did 911’, ‘killnirs’, ‘hitler was right’, and 'Fuck Nirs’. One of the user accounts was u/HangNi***rs.

Hey Laguna Chat, get your shit together.

Edit: markdown defeated me again. I think you can figure out what those words are.

  • RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    481·
    1 year ago

    Looks like an instance someone spun up and never looked at again.

    It clearly has no one policing content, or I’d hope someone would have flagged the shit porn on their support communities.

    Just because anyone can start an instance doesn’t mean everyone should.

    • Fisk400@lemmy.worldEnglish
      32·
      1 year ago

      It feels like s legal liability to start a instance and not police it. People could upload CP and you would be on the hook because you are the server owner and clearly did nothing to stop it.

      • million@lemmy.worldEnglish
        103·
        1 year ago

        It’s worse because now other servers federating with you are on hook legally as well.

        The law doesn’t make allowances for federated servers. Essential it’s your sever getting the CP in the eyes of the law.

        • Zak@lemmy.worldEnglish
          11·
          1 year ago

          The short, definitely not legal advice version is that it only becomes a crime if you have actual knowledge that there is CP on your server, and you fail to block access to it and make the legally mandated report.

          The law was written with ISPs hosting email and websites for paying customers in mind, but it applies equally well to anonymous user-generated content, federation, and other scenarios we may not have even imagined yet. Being an inattentive server admin is a valid legal defense, though actually having to use it in court would be stressful and expensive.

        • SeedyOne@lemmy.caEnglish
          7·
          1 year ago

          That can’t be accurate otherwise it’d be incredibly easy to have maliciously taken down “the Fediverse” long ago. There might not be a direct Fedi distinction in the law and it might be too complex for the average district attorney to understand on the surface but that doesn’t equate to “everyone is breaking the law” if something illegal shows up on a feed.