I’m truly not sure what to say… This is a big deal I think.

  • Hirom@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    How reliable is “The Debrief”?

    A quick look show UAPs is one of their focus, but they also claim to be science based and rigorous. Their homepage features multiples articles on UAP. Their mission statement include a section about “Mysteries in the Skies”.

    It’s not clear if this is just speculation and coverage of random UAP claims, or if there’s actually something there. The former is more likely.

      • Hirom@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Right, the author quotes various people speculating recovered materials have non-human origin, and technically isn’t speculating himself.

        It wouldn’t be the first time people cry wolf aliens and claim there is proof, then fall short when times come to make the data public.

        It’s an extraordinary claim, with lots of talk, but little evidence shown. I assume claims and evidence (or lack thereof) will be investigated since there’s a whistleblower complain. But I’m not holding my breath.

    • SpacemanSpiff@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was wondering the same thing. What has me intrigued is that a few congressmen tweeted about this source being “credible”. And the fact that this whistleblower apparently testified for over 11 hours in a closed-door congressional hearing has me wondering if this is actually something.

    • cavemeat@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’ve already given them more credit than I would, but I’ve always been very skeptical of this sort of thing. I’m not sure if I would call this news, its more like speculation.